Employers’ Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations to Employ People with Disabilities

This article explores the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (COM) for the employment of people with disabilities (PWD) of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Norway and the Netherlands. This COM-B (behavior) model provides useful insights for developing demand-side policies aimed at promoting PWD’s labour-market participation. Four groups of SMEs are distinguished: inclusive SMEs, non-inclusive SMEs, SMEs with the intention to employ PWD (inclusion-willing), and SMEs with past experience in employing PWD (inclusion-experienced). Based on survey data, we found that whereas non-inclusive SMEs score significantly lower on capabilities and opportunities than inclusive SMEs, inclusion-willing and inclusion-experienced SMEs hardly differ from inclusive SMEs. No significant differences were found regarding motivations of the four groups. In addition, the groups’ COM factors hardly differ when they are compared across both countries. Nevertheless, SMEs in both countries do differ with regard to their specific motivations to employ PWD. Implications for policies and employer services are discussed.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Society
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746426101389
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employers’ Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations to Employ People with Disabilities

Social Policy and Society
Disability Education and Employment
article

Employers’ Capabilities, Opportunities, and Motivations to Employ People with Disabilities

article en

Abstract

This article explores the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (COM) for the employment of people with disabilities (PWD) of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Norway and the Netherlands. This COM-B (behavior) model provides useful insights for developing demand-side policies aimed at promoting PWD’s labour-market participation. Four groups of SMEs are distinguished: inclusive SMEs, non-inclusive SMEs, SMEs with the intention to employ PWD (inclusion-willing), and SMEs with past experience in employing PWD (inclusion-experienced). Based on survey data, we found that whereas non-inclusive SMEs score significantly lower on capabilities and opportunities than inclusive SMEs, inclusion-willing and inclusion-experienced SMEs hardly differ from inclusive SMEs. No significant differences were found regarding motivations of the four groups. In addition, the groups’ COM factors hardly differ when they are compared across both countries. Nevertheless, SMEs in both countries do differ with regard to their specific motivations to employ PWD. Implications for policies and employer services are discussed.

Social Policy and Society
Institute on Governance (CA), Metropolitan University (BD)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.