Climate Intervention and Mitigation: Strategic Responses to Technological Advances in Solar Geoengineering

The urgency of addressing climate change has led to the exploration of solar geoengineering (SGE)—a collection of technologies that cool the planet by reflecting a fraction of sunlight back into space. One of the most prominent concerns with SGE is that it may crowd out greenhouse gas mitigation efforts. This paper examines how advances in SGE technologies may impact mitigation. We conduct a social dilemma experiment with treatments that vary how effective SGE is at reducing climate damages and the level of certainty about its effects. Results indicate SGE generally leads to increased cooperation on mitigation, but importantly, we find that mitigation levels decrease significantly as SGE technologies become more effective and less uncertain. At an individual level, agents that stand to benefit the most tend to decrease mitigation, while those that are vulnerable to SGE act to diminish the role of SGE by increasing mitigation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-026-01072-7
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Intervention and Mitigation: Strategic Responses to Technological Advances in Solar Geoengineering

Environmental and Resource Economics
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Climate Intervention and Mitigation: Strategic Responses to Technological Advances in Solar Geoengineering

article en

Abstract

The urgency of addressing climate change has led to the exploration of solar geoengineering (SGE)—a collection of technologies that cool the planet by reflecting a fraction of sunlight back into space. One of the most prominent concerns with SGE is that it may crowd out greenhouse gas mitigation efforts. This paper examines how advances in SGE technologies may impact mitigation. We conduct a social dilemma experiment with treatments that vary how effective SGE is at reducing climate damages and the level of certainty about its effects. Results indicate SGE generally leads to increased cooperation on mitigation, but importantly, we find that mitigation levels decrease significantly as SGE technologies become more effective and less uncertain. At an individual level, agents that stand to benefit the most tend to decrease mitigation, while those that are vulnerable to SGE act to diminish the role of SGE by increasing mitigation.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 89(4)
University of Wyoming (US), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), Appalachian State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate Intervention and Mitigation: Strategic Responses to Technological Advances in Solar Geoengineering · Environmental and Resource Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS