Measure what matters: Using an AI chatbot to evaluate the mental wellbeing impact of creative health programmes

• Chatbot exemplifies potential for innovative scalable evaluation of creative health programmes • Chatbot wellbeing scores correlated with WEMWBS scores • Chatbot measured outcomes beyond WEMWBS, e.g. creativity, new skills, social connection • Engagement with chatbot exceeded survey completion and was preferred by participants • Participants found chatbot more reflective of wellbeing than traditional surveys Creative health programmes can enhance mental wellbeing, yet their complexity presents challenges for robust evaluation. Traditional outcome measures may fail to capture the nuanced, multidimensional impacts of arts-based interventions. We investigated whether an AI-powered conversational agent (Kenji) could effectively capture wellbeing outcomes in community arts programmes to provide an alternative evaluation approach to conventional survey methods. We deployed Kenji, a domain-adapted AI chatbot, alongside its text-to-wellbeing scoring model across four arts programmes in London over nine weeks, engaging 73 participants through structured yet naturalistic chat interactions. Participants' wellbeing was assessed using both an AI-based scoring model and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). We examined engagement patterns, correlations between AI-derived scores and WEMWBS, and the breadth of qualitative outcomes captured. Participants demonstrated significantly higher engagement with the chatbot compared to the WEMWBS (86% vs 50% completion rates) and preferred the interaction with the chatbot (89%). The overall AI-derived wellbeing scores showed positive correlation with WEMWBS scores (corr = 0.66, p < 0.05). The AI-based scoring model also captured broader qualitative outcomes, including enhanced sense of purpose (mentioned by 95% of participants), improved mood (95%), increased creativity (93%), and strengthened social connections (86%). Our innovative study exemplifies the unexplored potential of AI-driven tools to enable scalable, person-centred evaluation of creative health interventions. This approach has the potential to address key methodological limitations in arts and health research and to offer new avenues for community organisations, funders, and healthcare providers seeking integrated, evidence-based approaches to social prescribing solutions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellbeing Space and Society
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2026.100388
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measure what matters: Using an AI chatbot to evaluate the mental wellbeing impact of creative health programmes

Wellbeing Space and Society
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Measure what matters: Using an AI chatbot to evaluate the mental wellbeing impact of creative health programmes

article en

Abstract

• Chatbot exemplifies potential for innovative scalable evaluation of creative health programmes • Chatbot wellbeing scores correlated with WEMWBS scores • Chatbot measured outcomes beyond WEMWBS, e.g. creativity, new skills, social connection • Engagement with chatbot exceeded survey completion and was preferred by participants • Participants found chatbot more reflective of wellbeing than traditional surveys Creative health programmes can enhance mental wellbeing, yet their complexity presents challenges for robust evaluation. Traditional outcome measures may fail to capture the nuanced, multidimensional impacts of arts-based interventions. We investigated whether an AI-powered conversational agent (Kenji) could effectively capture wellbeing outcomes in community arts programmes to provide an alternative evaluation approach to conventional survey methods. We deployed Kenji, a domain-adapted AI chatbot, alongside its text-to-wellbeing scoring model across four arts programmes in London over nine weeks, engaging 73 participants through structured yet naturalistic chat interactions. Participants' wellbeing was assessed using both an AI-based scoring model and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). We examined engagement patterns, correlations between AI-derived scores and WEMWBS, and the breadth of qualitative outcomes captured. Participants demonstrated significantly higher engagement with the chatbot compared to the WEMWBS (86% vs 50% completion rates) and preferred the interaction with the chatbot (89%). The overall AI-derived wellbeing scores showed positive correlation with WEMWBS scores (corr = 0.66, p < 0.05). The AI-based scoring model also captured broader qualitative outcomes, including enhanced sense of purpose (mentioned by 95% of participants), improved mood (95%), increased creativity (93%), and strengthened social connections (86%). Our innovative study exemplifies the unexplored potential of AI-driven tools to enable scalable, person-centred evaluation of creative health interventions. This approach has the potential to address key methodological limitations in arts and health research and to offer new avenues for community organisations, funders, and healthcare providers seeking integrated, evidence-based approaches to social prescribing solutions.

Wellbeing Space and SocietyVol. 10
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Kensei Hospital (JP), Lewin Group (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.