Support vector machines for indoor visible light positioning: a comparative study with neural networks

Abstract This paper provides a detailed comparison of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Neural Networks (NN) in the context of indoor visible light positioning systems, emphasizing positioning accuracy and error correction. The findings reveal that the SVM model substantially outperforms the NN model across several key metrics. SVM achieves a prediction accuracy of 99.87%, notably higher than NN’s 96.94%, and a mean positioning error of just 0.0025, compared to the NN’s 0.0634. The SVM model also demonstrates a superior alignment between predicted and actual positions, with minimal discrepancies, whereas the NN model shows significant discrepancies. Furthermore, the scatter plot observations confirm the SVM’s minimal error distribution, reinforcing its reliability. These results indicate that the SVM model is not only more accurate but also more robust, making it a superior choice for implementing high-precision indoor visible light positioning systems. The SVM’s outstanding performance metrics, including an R² score of 1, highlight its potential as a leading solution in this domain.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Optics
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-026-03075-5
Primary Topic
Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Support vector machines for indoor visible light positioning: a comparative study with neural networks

Journal of Optics
Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
article

Support vector machines for indoor visible light positioning: a comparative study with neural networks

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a detailed comparison of Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Neural Networks (NN) in the context of indoor visible light positioning systems, emphasizing positioning accuracy and error correction. The findings reveal that the SVM model substantially outperforms the NN model across several key metrics. SVM achieves a prediction accuracy of 99.87%, notably higher than NN’s 96.94%, and a mean positioning error of just 0.0025, compared to the NN’s 0.0634. The SVM model also demonstrates a superior alignment between predicted and actual positions, with minimal discrepancies, whereas the NN model shows significant discrepancies. Furthermore, the scatter plot observations confirm the SVM’s minimal error distribution, reinforcing its reliability. These results indicate that the SVM model is not only more accurate but also more robust, making it a superior choice for implementing high-precision indoor visible light positioning systems. The SVM’s outstanding performance metrics, including an R² score of 1, highlight its potential as a leading solution in this domain.

Journal of Optics
Misr University for Science and Technology (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.