Comparing the Indoor Efficiencies of Organic Solar Cells Based on the Solution‐Processed and Thermally Evaporated Anode‐Modifying Layers

The photovoltaic performances of organic solar cells (OSCs) using solution‐processed poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) and thermally evaporated MoO 3 for the anodic modification have been characterized and modeled under both 1 sun AM 1.5G and indoor illuminations. The MoO 3 decreases the energetic disorder of active layer than PEDOT:PSS, attributed to that the p ‐doping effect of MoO 3 in donor generates a certain number of free holes and thereby suppresses the subgap absorption of active layer. The device with MoO 3 shows much bigger shunt resistance than the one with PEDOT:PSS under indoor light, because neither MoO 3 nor PEDOT:PSS gets markedly photoexcited under indoor light, but the MoO 3 has smaller excess free volume and thereby better inhibits the formation of the parallel paths than PEDOT:PSS. As a result, the MoO 3 enables higher indoor efficiencies than the PEDOT:PSS. The current research indicates that the anode‐modifying layers with high work function, small excess free volume, and high visible‐light transparency are desirable for making highly efficient OSCs for the indoor applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
physica status solidi (a)
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.202500765
Primary Topic
Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Indoor Efficiencies of Organic Solar Cells Based on the Solution‐Processed and Thermally Evaporated Anode‐Modifying Layers

physica status solidi (a)
Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
article

Comparing the Indoor Efficiencies of Organic Solar Cells Based on the Solution‐Processed and Thermally Evaporated Anode‐Modifying Layers

article en

Abstract

The photovoltaic performances of organic solar cells (OSCs) using solution‐processed poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) and thermally evaporated MoO 3 for the anodic modification have been characterized and modeled under both 1 sun AM 1.5G and indoor illuminations. The MoO 3 decreases the energetic disorder of active layer than PEDOT:PSS, attributed to that the p ‐doping effect of MoO 3 in donor generates a certain number of free holes and thereby suppresses the subgap absorption of active layer. The device with MoO 3 shows much bigger shunt resistance than the one with PEDOT:PSS under indoor light, because neither MoO 3 nor PEDOT:PSS gets markedly photoexcited under indoor light, but the MoO 3 has smaller excess free volume and thereby better inhibits the formation of the parallel paths than PEDOT:PSS. As a result, the MoO 3 enables higher indoor efficiencies than the PEDOT:PSS. The current research indicates that the anode‐modifying layers with high work function, small excess free volume, and high visible‐light transparency are desirable for making highly efficient OSCs for the indoor applications.

physica status solidi (a)Vol. 223(7)
Hebei University of Technology (CN), Institute of Process Engineering (CN), Zhengzhou Institute of Emerging Industrial Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing the Indoor Efficiencies of Organic Solar Cells Based on the Solution‐Processed and Thermally Evaporated Anode‐Modifying Layers · physica status solidi (a) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS