Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility

Behavioral and automated methods are both capable of revealing subtle differences in the visual accessibility of fonts. The behavioral method requires labor-intensive human testing. The automated method does not require human testing, and may sometimes provide a practical alternative.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345068
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility

PLoS ONE
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility

article en

Abstract

Behavioral and automated methods are both capable of revealing subtle differences in the visual accessibility of fonts. The behavioral method requires labor-intensive human testing. The automated method does not require human testing, and may sometimes provide a practical alternative.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(3)
University of Minnesota (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of newly designed fonts for visual accessibility · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS