Strategic deviations and firm employment decisions – empirical evidence from China

Purpose Whether firms should pursue strategies that deviate from industry norms has received considerable scholarly attention. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of Chinese listed non-financial firms over the period 2007–2023, this study examines the impact of strategic deviation on firms’ employment decisions. Findings We find that a higher degree of strategic deviation is associated with a significant reduction in firm employment size. Mechanism analysis indicates that strategic deviation adversely affects employment through two channels: reducing access to long-term credit and strengthening liquidity-oriented defensive behavior. Further analysis reveals that low-educated workers experience more pronounced negative effects, whereas the employment of highly educated workers remains largely unaffected. This pattern suggests that firms enhance their human capital composition, exhibiting a dual tendency of workforce downsizing and quality upgrading. Originality/value This study is among the first to investigate the labor market consequences of strategic deviation, thereby extending the literature on strategic deviation and identifying an additional potential source of unemployment.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Manpower
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-08-2025-0711
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic deviations and firm employment decisions – empirical evidence from China

International Journal of Manpower
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

Strategic deviations and firm employment decisions – empirical evidence from China

article en

Abstract

Purpose Whether firms should pursue strategies that deviate from industry norms has received considerable scholarly attention. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of Chinese listed non-financial firms over the period 2007–2023, this study examines the impact of strategic deviation on firms’ employment decisions. Findings We find that a higher degree of strategic deviation is associated with a significant reduction in firm employment size. Mechanism analysis indicates that strategic deviation adversely affects employment through two channels: reducing access to long-term credit and strengthening liquidity-oriented defensive behavior. Further analysis reveals that low-educated workers experience more pronounced negative effects, whereas the employment of highly educated workers remains largely unaffected. This pattern suggests that firms enhance their human capital composition, exhibiting a dual tendency of workforce downsizing and quality upgrading. Originality/value This study is among the first to investigate the labor market consequences of strategic deviation, thereby extending the literature on strategic deviation and identifying an additional potential source of unemployment.

International Journal of Manpower
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.