Board Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social and Governance Performance; Evidence From 10 Sectors and 10 European Union Countries

ABSTRACT This paper examines the influence of different measures of the board gender diversity (BGD) on the Environmental, Social, and Governance disclosure quality of 253 firms from 10 sectors in 10 European countries (EC) during the 2011–2021 period to check which pillar of the ESG receives more favorable attention from gender diversity (GD) and to research if this relationship holds similarly across countries and sectors. A multiple 2‐way firm and year effects static panel model with different proxies of GD was used. Ordinary least squares as a baseline technique was applied. For robustness check, one‐step system GMM was applied on the dynamic version of the considered models. Drawing on resource dependency theory, agency theory, and legitimacy theory, this study finds that GD influences ESG performance. At the country and sector level, the results are either insignificant or mixed. The governance dimension consistently shows a positive effect across both countries and sectors side.

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70564
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Board Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social and Governance Performance; Evidence From 10 Sectors and 10 European Union Countries

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Board Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social and Governance Performance; Evidence From 10 Sectors and 10 European Union Countries

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the influence of different measures of the board gender diversity (BGD) on the Environmental, Social, and Governance disclosure quality of 253 firms from 10 sectors in 10 European countries (EC) during the 2011–2021 period to check which pillar of the ESG receives more favorable attention from gender diversity (GD) and to research if this relationship holds similarly across countries and sectors. A multiple 2‐way firm and year effects static panel model with different proxies of GD was used. Ordinary least squares as a baseline technique was applied. For robustness check, one‐step system GMM was applied on the dynamic version of the considered models. Drawing on resource dependency theory, agency theory, and legitimacy theory, this study finds that GD influences ESG performance. At the country and sector level, the results are either insignificant or mixed. The governance dimension consistently shows a positive effect across both countries and sectors side.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.