‘Being empathetic to my patients and ourselves’: a qualitative process evaluation of READ-Y psychological first aid training for healthcare workers working in routine care

<b>Introduction:</b> Healthcare workers (HCWs) are routinely exposed to distressing and potentially traumatic events during frontline care, yet receive limited structure training to manage such exposure. Psychological first aid (PFA) training has been widely disseminated among emergency responders and is increasingly being adapted for HCWs; however, its acceptability, implementation, and use in routine care remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore how an adapted PFA training programme was perceived, implemented, and used by HCWs in routine care, and to identify the mechanisms and contextual factors that influenced its impact.<b>Method:</b> A qualitative process evaluation was conducted alongside the delivery of the READ-Y (Rapport, Evaluation, Aid, Disposition, Yourself) PFA training programme in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Data collection included 3 months of observations of training delivery and 19 semi-structured interviews with HCW trainees, ward managers, and trainers/facilitators. Data were analysed using framework analysis.<b>Results:</b> Training was logistically feasible, consistently delivered, and characterized by high engagement in simulation and debriefing. Key fidelity elements of PFA training were maintained. Five key themes emerged: (1) positive reception of the adapted, blended-format training; (2) PFA was viewed as a pragmatic, stepwise tool for strengthening basic psychosocial support in routine care; (3) reported improvement in empathy, communication, and normalization of self-care among staff; (4) targeted skills development and peer learning as key mechanisms of reported change, fostering a shared language and support; and (5) multi-level contextual enablers (e.g. leadership endorsement, protected time) were identified and structural barriers (e.g. workload, burnout) existed that may hinder uptake.<b>Conclusion:</b> The adapted PFA training programme was perceived as feasible, relevant, and acceptable for HCWs, facilitating the integration of psychosocial support into routine care while promoting their own well-being. System-level integration and longitudinal evaluation of PFA training are recommended to assess sustained impact on patient and staff outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2627705
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Being empathetic to my patients and ourselves’: a qualitative process evaluation of READ-Y psychological first aid training for healthcare workers working in routine care

C. Qiu, Muli Hu, Mary Leamy, Xizhao Li et al.
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

‘Being empathetic to my patients and ourselves’: a qualitative process evaluation of READ-Y psychological first aid training for healthcare workers working in routine care

C. Qiu, Muli Hu, Mary Leamy, Xizhao Li, Yu Liu, Lin Xu, Yeqing Wu, Ziqing Zhong, Ting Liu, Ling Wang, Lina Zeng, Jianjian Wang
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Healthcare workers (HCWs) are routinely exposed to distressing and potentially traumatic events during frontline care, yet receive limited structure training to manage such exposure. Psychological first aid (PFA) training has been widely disseminated among emergency responders and is increasingly being adapted for HCWs; however, its acceptability, implementation, and use in routine care remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore how an adapted PFA training programme was perceived, implemented, and used by HCWs in routine care, and to identify the mechanisms and contextual factors that influenced its impact.<b>Method:</b> A qualitative process evaluation was conducted alongside the delivery of the READ-Y (Rapport, Evaluation, Aid, Disposition, Yourself) PFA training programme in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Data collection included 3 months of observations of training delivery and 19 semi-structured interviews with HCW trainees, ward managers, and trainers/facilitators. Data were analysed using framework analysis.<b>Results:</b> Training was logistically feasible, consistently delivered, and characterized by high engagement in simulation and debriefing. Key fidelity elements of PFA training were maintained. Five key themes emerged: (1) positive reception of the adapted, blended-format training; (2) PFA was viewed as a pragmatic, stepwise tool for strengthening basic psychosocial support in routine care; (3) reported improvement in empathy, communication, and normalization of self-care among staff; (4) targeted skills development and peer learning as key mechanisms of reported change, fostering a shared language and support; and (5) multi-level contextual enablers (e.g. leadership endorsement, protected time) were identified and structural barriers (e.g. workload, burnout) existed that may hinder uptake.<b>Conclusion:</b> The adapted PFA training programme was perceived as feasible, relevant, and acceptable for HCWs, facilitating the integration of psychosocial support into routine care while promoting their own well-being. System-level integration and longitudinal evaluation of PFA training are recommended to assess sustained impact on patient and staff outcomes.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 17(1)
Central South University (CN), Shenzhen Polytechnic University (CN), King's College London (GB), Sichuan University (CN), Soochow University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), The Polytechnic University of Japan (JP), Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.