Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review With a Focus on Country Effects

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between board independence and corporate social responsibility (CSR) outcomes. Based on legitimacy theory, we conducted a structured literature review of 167 archival studies to analyze the influence of board independence on CSR performance and reporting. In light of the heterogeneous link between these variables, we included country effects as contextual factors and separated country‐specific studies in their Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) membership and board structure. This is the first structured review that synthesizes board independence evidence specifically through the lens of country effects, indicating that most of the included studies found a positive impact of board independence on CSR outcomes. However, while cross‐country studies stressed inconclusive results, the positive connection between board independence and CSR was restricted to regimes with a one‐tier system. Moreover, while a positive link between board independence and CSR reporting (“talk”) was not dependent on OECD status, board independence tended to increase CSR performance (“walk”) only in OECD countries.

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70567
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review With a Focus on Country Effects

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review With a Focus on Country Effects

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between board independence and corporate social responsibility (CSR) outcomes. Based on legitimacy theory, we conducted a structured literature review of 167 archival studies to analyze the influence of board independence on CSR performance and reporting. In light of the heterogeneous link between these variables, we included country effects as contextual factors and separated country‐specific studies in their Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) membership and board structure. This is the first structured review that synthesizes board independence evidence specifically through the lens of country effects, indicating that most of the included studies found a positive impact of board independence on CSR outcomes. However, while cross‐country studies stressed inconclusive results, the positive connection between board independence and CSR was restricted to regimes with a one‐tier system. Moreover, while a positive link between board independence and CSR reporting (“talk”) was not dependent on OECD status, board independence tended to increase CSR performance (“walk”) only in OECD countries.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Board Independence and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review With a Focus on Country Effects · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS