A machine learning-derived biological age model for liver grafts provides a superior assessment of aging compared to chronological age in transplantation

Liver transplantation is severely restricted by shortages of donors, yet relying on chronological age (CA) for donor selection often results in potentially viable grafts being discarded. This study developed a machine learning-based framework to predict the biological age (BA) of liver grafts and evaluate its clinical utility. Data from 247 donors were analyzed to create BA models using conventional linear methods and four genetic algorithm-optimized machine learning models. These models were then validated in an independent temporal cohort of 82 donor-recipient pairs. While multiple linear regression (MLR) showed a higher correlation (r = 0.82), the gradient boosting (GB) model captured unique nonlinear biological signals. Importantly, BA derived from the GB model demonstrated superior clinical relevance, serving as an independent predictor of biliary complications (AUC = 0.80) and graft survival, whereas CA failed to predict these outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that accelerated ageing, defined as a BA exceeding CA, was an independent risk factor for graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.188). This exploratory study suggests that BA captures the aging heterogeneity of liver grafts which cannot be identified by the CA of donors. Furthermore, the genetic algorithm-optimized model shows potential in predicting biliary complications and survival outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45531-z
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A machine learning-derived biological age model for liver grafts provides a superior assessment of aging compared to chronological age in transplantation

Scientific Reports
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

A machine learning-derived biological age model for liver grafts provides a superior assessment of aging compared to chronological age in transplantation

article en

Abstract

Liver transplantation is severely restricted by shortages of donors, yet relying on chronological age (CA) for donor selection often results in potentially viable grafts being discarded. This study developed a machine learning-based framework to predict the biological age (BA) of liver grafts and evaluate its clinical utility. Data from 247 donors were analyzed to create BA models using conventional linear methods and four genetic algorithm-optimized machine learning models. These models were then validated in an independent temporal cohort of 82 donor-recipient pairs. While multiple linear regression (MLR) showed a higher correlation (r = 0.82), the gradient boosting (GB) model captured unique nonlinear biological signals. Importantly, BA derived from the GB model demonstrated superior clinical relevance, serving as an independent predictor of biliary complications (AUC = 0.80) and graft survival, whereas CA failed to predict these outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that accelerated ageing, defined as a BA exceeding CA, was an independent risk factor for graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.188). This exploratory study suggests that BA captures the aging heterogeneity of liver grafts which cannot be identified by the CA of donors. Furthermore, the genetic algorithm-optimized model shows potential in predicting biliary complications and survival outcomes.

Scientific Reports
Qingdao University (CN), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Shanxi Medical University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN), Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.