Solid-state Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFSD) of dissimilar Al Cu materials with FSP-enabled interface design for improved metallurgical bonding

Dissimilar aluminum‑copper material systems are widely used in thermal management, electrical interconnects, and multifunctional structural components, but their reliable fabrication remains difficult due to large differences in physical properties and the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds (IMCs). Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFSD), a solid-state additive manufacturing process, mitigates many of these challenges by enabling metallurgical bonding through frictional heating and severe plastic deformation (SPD) below the melting point, thereby avoiding melting-related defects. In this study, AA6061 was deposited onto Cu substrates featuring two interface geometries (flat and dovetail) and two surface conditions (with and without friction stir processing, FSP), yielding four distinct processing conditions. Comprehensive material and mechanical characterization revealed that IMC formation primarily consisted of Al₂Cu , Al 3 Cu AlCu , and Al 4 Cu 9 , with their thickness and continuity governed predominantly by the imposed thermomechanical history rather than the interface geometry. Microhardness profiles remained relatively uniform across each processing condition with only modest interfacial hardening corresponding to localized IMC accumulation. Mechanical testing showed that flat AFSD interface exhibited limited strain capacity and brittle, interface-dominated failure; dovetail interfaces permitted greater global displacement due to their geometric compliance but did not produce true ductile behavior; and FSP-modified interfaces (flat and dovetail) demonstrated the most balanced mechanical performance through enhancement of diffusion and interfacial refinement, delaying crack initiation, redistributing strain, and promoting mixed ductile-brittle fracture behavior. Overall, the results demonstrate that enhanced metallurgical bonding and printability of Al Cu joints in AFSD require the coupling of thermomechanical preprocessing and interface architecture, providing a pathway for multi-material components in advanced engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2026.03.037
Primary Topic
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solid-state Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFSD) of dissimilar Al Cu materials with FSP-enabled interface design for improved metallurgical bonding

James Caudill, Shivangi Paliwal, I.S. Jawahir, R. Sarvesha
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
article

Solid-state Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFSD) of dissimilar Al Cu materials with FSP-enabled interface design for improved metallurgical bonding

James Caudill, Shivangi Paliwal, I.S. Jawahir, R. Sarvesha
article en

Abstract

Dissimilar aluminum‑copper material systems are widely used in thermal management, electrical interconnects, and multifunctional structural components, but their reliable fabrication remains difficult due to large differences in physical properties and the formation of brittle intermetallic compounds (IMCs). Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFSD), a solid-state additive manufacturing process, mitigates many of these challenges by enabling metallurgical bonding through frictional heating and severe plastic deformation (SPD) below the melting point, thereby avoiding melting-related defects. In this study, AA6061 was deposited onto Cu substrates featuring two interface geometries (flat and dovetail) and two surface conditions (with and without friction stir processing, FSP), yielding four distinct processing conditions. Comprehensive material and mechanical characterization revealed that IMC formation primarily consisted of Al₂Cu , Al 3 Cu AlCu , and Al 4 Cu 9 , with their thickness and continuity governed predominantly by the imposed thermomechanical history rather than the interface geometry. Microhardness profiles remained relatively uniform across each processing condition with only modest interfacial hardening corresponding to localized IMC accumulation. Mechanical testing showed that flat AFSD interface exhibited limited strain capacity and brittle, interface-dominated failure; dovetail interfaces permitted greater global displacement due to their geometric compliance but did not produce true ductile behavior; and FSP-modified interfaces (flat and dovetail) demonstrated the most balanced mechanical performance through enhancement of diffusion and interfacial refinement, delaying crack initiation, redistributing strain, and promoting mixed ductile-brittle fracture behavior. Overall, the results demonstrate that enhanced metallurgical bonding and printability of Al Cu joints in AFSD require the coupling of thermomechanical preprocessing and interface architecture, providing a pathway for multi-material components in advanced engineering applications.

Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesVol. 166
Manufacturing Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.