A systematic review and meta-analysis of depressive symptoms and work-ralated psychoacial factors among healthcare workers

Studies that synthesised the pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms and work-related psycho-social factors among HCWs exposed to these factors are scarce. Therefore, this review aimed to synthesise information on pooled prevalence and association with work-related psychosocial factors with depressive symptoms in healthcare workers. Observational studies reporting prevalence and measures of effect sizes for work-related psychosocial factors of depressive symptoms were searched from PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences. Primary studies that reported prevalence of depressive symptoms and effect sizes for work-related psychosocial factors (job-strain, workplace social support, effort reward ratio, and overcommitment were included in the review. Healthcare workers. The random-effects model was used due to significant anticipated heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochran’s Q test and quantified using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger’s and Begg’s test. Thirty-one studies with 57,847 participants were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms was 30.9% (95% CI 22.7–40.6%) with significant heterogeneity of I-Squared = 99.6% with p-value < 0.001. Those healthcare workers who perceived effort-reward imbalance (ERR > 1) had higher odds of experiencing depressive symptoms (pOR 4.11, 95% CI 2.93, 5.77). Similarly, over-commitment (pOR 2.88, 95% CI 1.87, 4.44), higher job strain (pOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.60, 3.80), and lower social support (pOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.58–3.51) were associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms. The review highlights the need to consider workplace interventions that may reduce depressive symptoms among HCWs and enhance rewards, optimising commitments, reducing job strain and improving social support in healthcare settings. Future longitudinal studies and intervention studies for low-income countries are required to establish causal relationships.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Mental Health
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-026-00416-5
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis of depressive symptoms and work-ralated psychoacial factors among healthcare workers

Discover Mental Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

A systematic review and meta-analysis of depressive symptoms and work-ralated psychoacial factors among healthcare workers

article en

Abstract

Studies that synthesised the pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms and work-related psycho-social factors among HCWs exposed to these factors are scarce. Therefore, this review aimed to synthesise information on pooled prevalence and association with work-related psychosocial factors with depressive symptoms in healthcare workers. Observational studies reporting prevalence and measures of effect sizes for work-related psychosocial factors of depressive symptoms were searched from PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences. Primary studies that reported prevalence of depressive symptoms and effect sizes for work-related psychosocial factors (job-strain, workplace social support, effort reward ratio, and overcommitment were included in the review. Healthcare workers. The random-effects model was used due to significant anticipated heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Cochran’s Q test and quantified using the I2 statistic. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger’s and Begg’s test. Thirty-one studies with 57,847 participants were included in the review. The pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms was 30.9% (95% CI 22.7–40.6%) with significant heterogeneity of I-Squared = 99.6% with p-value < 0.001. Those healthcare workers who perceived effort-reward imbalance (ERR > 1) had higher odds of experiencing depressive symptoms (pOR 4.11, 95% CI 2.93, 5.77). Similarly, over-commitment (pOR 2.88, 95% CI 1.87, 4.44), higher job strain (pOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.60, 3.80), and lower social support (pOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.58–3.51) were associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms. The review highlights the need to consider workplace interventions that may reduce depressive symptoms among HCWs and enhance rewards, optimising commitments, reducing job strain and improving social support in healthcare settings. Future longitudinal studies and intervention studies for low-income countries are required to establish causal relationships.

Discover Mental Health
Yahoo (Spain) (ES), Hosan University (KR), African Population and Health Research Center (KE), Addis Ababa University (ET), Amref Health Africa (TZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.