Do men face greater barriers to accessing HIV testing services than women? Might HIV self-testing be the answer? Evidence from a longitudinal survey in east Zimbabwe (2018–2023)

HIV testing is crucial for prevention and treatment, yet barriers may disproportionately affect men in some sub-Saharan African settings. HIV self-testing (HIVST) may offer a promising solution, but its uptake remains under-explored. This study examines sex-specific barriers, HIV testing trends, and HIVST uptake in Manicaland, Zimbabwe, across three survey rounds pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19. We conducted longitudinal surveys 2018-2019 (pre- COVID-19), 2021 (during COVID-19), 2022-2023 (post-COVID-19), across six socio-economic zones (tea estates, rural villages, forestry areas, towns, roadside settlements, and urban areas) in eastern Zimbabwe. The study employed an open cohort design with repeated cross-sections, complemented by a sub-analysis among repeat participants to assess robustness. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, HIV testing, perceived barriers, and HIVST awareness and usage were analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Men consistently had lower odds of HIV testing than women (2022-2023, aOR=0.74, 95% CI:0.67-0.81, P < 0.001). Barriers to HIV testing peaked during COVID-19 (2021), with men reporting three to five times higher barriers than women, including "judgmental staff" (24.5% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.005) and "lack of privacy" (21.5% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.032). Rural residents had reduced testing odds post-COVID-19 (aOR=0.82, 95% CI:0.69-0.99, P = 0.034). Although HIVST awareness increased, particularly among men compared to women, (66.7% vs 58.5%, aOR=2.21, 95% CI:2.09-2.33, P < 0.001), usage remained low (5.9%, vs 9.8%). Men report substantially greater barriers to HIV testing in Zimbabwe, exacerbated during the COVID-19 and are now further threatened by cuts to HIV funding. Although HIVST awareness expanded, its low uptake among men highlights the need for improved linkage-to-care mechanisms and tailored outreach such as peer-led distribution models.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006125
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do men face greater barriers to accessing HIV testing services than women? Might HIV self-testing be the answer? Evidence from a longitudinal survey in east Zimbabwe (2018–2023)

PLOS Global Public Health
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Do men face greater barriers to accessing HIV testing services than women? Might HIV self-testing be the answer? Evidence from a longitudinal survey in east Zimbabwe (2018–2023)

article en

Abstract

HIV testing is crucial for prevention and treatment, yet barriers may disproportionately affect men in some sub-Saharan African settings. HIV self-testing (HIVST) may offer a promising solution, but its uptake remains under-explored. This study examines sex-specific barriers, HIV testing trends, and HIVST uptake in Manicaland, Zimbabwe, across three survey rounds pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19. We conducted longitudinal surveys 2018-2019 (pre- COVID-19), 2021 (during COVID-19), 2022-2023 (post-COVID-19), across six socio-economic zones (tea estates, rural villages, forestry areas, towns, roadside settlements, and urban areas) in eastern Zimbabwe. The study employed an open cohort design with repeated cross-sections, complemented by a sub-analysis among repeat participants to assess robustness. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, HIV testing, perceived barriers, and HIVST awareness and usage were analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Men consistently had lower odds of HIV testing than women (2022-2023, aOR=0.74, 95% CI:0.67-0.81, P < 0.001). Barriers to HIV testing peaked during COVID-19 (2021), with men reporting three to five times higher barriers than women, including "judgmental staff" (24.5% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.005) and "lack of privacy" (21.5% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.032). Rural residents had reduced testing odds post-COVID-19 (aOR=0.82, 95% CI:0.69-0.99, P = 0.034). Although HIVST awareness increased, particularly among men compared to women, (66.7% vs 58.5%, aOR=2.21, 95% CI:2.09-2.33, P < 0.001), usage remained low (5.9%, vs 9.8%). Men report substantially greater barriers to HIV testing in Zimbabwe, exacerbated during the COVID-19 and are now further threatened by cuts to HIV funding. Although HIVST awareness expanded, its low uptake among men highlights the need for improved linkage-to-care mechanisms and tailored outreach such as peer-led distribution models.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(3)
Africa Center (US), Biomedical Research and Training Institute (ZW), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), Imperial College London (GB), University of Lincoln (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.