Analysis of In-Situ Electrochemical Characterisation Methods for Porous GaN Distributed Bragg Reflectors

The applicability of porous GaN distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) is currently limited by non-uniformity and a lack of electrochemical etching (ECE) control. This work presents a detailed comparison of ex-situ and in-situ characterisation techniques for analysing pore morphology, uniformity, and ECE progression in dislocation-mediated porous DBR fabrication. A double layer capacitance (CDL) protocol has been developed and integrated with ECE as a real-time measurement of pore surface area. Ex-situ methods (cross-sectional SEM, BSE imaging, FIB-SEM tomography) provide valuable structural insight, but each possesses significant limitations, and none provide live insight to the ECE progression. In-situ electrochemical measurements (ECE current, charge, and CDL) are shown to be unable to entirely replace ex-situ analysis due to overlapping contributions from different layers being electrochemically etched simultaneously, but offer complementary information to enhance the process of DBR optimisation and provide real-time pore evolution and morphology data. Combining in-situ and ex-situ characterisation offers an improved understanding of porous GaN DBR formation, providing a foundation for systematic optimisation and improved fabrication of high-performance, scalable porous DBR structures.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.128653
Primary Topic
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of In-Situ Electrochemical Characterisation Methods for Porous GaN Distributed Bragg Reflectors

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
article

Analysis of In-Situ Electrochemical Characterisation Methods for Porous GaN Distributed Bragg Reflectors

article en

Abstract

The applicability of porous GaN distributed Bragg reflectors (DBRs) is currently limited by non-uniformity and a lack of electrochemical etching (ECE) control. This work presents a detailed comparison of ex-situ and in-situ characterisation techniques for analysing pore morphology, uniformity, and ECE progression in dislocation-mediated porous DBR fabrication. A double layer capacitance (CDL) protocol has been developed and integrated with ECE as a real-time measurement of pore surface area. Ex-situ methods (cross-sectional SEM, BSE imaging, FIB-SEM tomography) provide valuable structural insight, but each possesses significant limitations, and none provide live insight to the ECE progression. In-situ electrochemical measurements (ECE current, charge, and CDL) are shown to be unable to entirely replace ex-situ analysis due to overlapping contributions from different layers being electrochemically etched simultaneously, but offer complementary information to enhance the process of DBR optimisation and provide real-time pore evolution and morphology data. Combining in-situ and ex-situ characterisation offers an improved understanding of porous GaN DBR formation, providing a foundation for systematic optimisation and improved fabrication of high-performance, scalable porous DBR structures.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of In-Situ Electrochemical Characterisation Methods for Porous GaN Distributed Bragg Reflectors · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS