A holistic framework for portfolio risk management of megaprojects

The distinctive characteristics of megaproject portfolios, particularly their complexity and interdependencies, shape how risks must be managed. This study explores how portfolio-level risk management activities influence performance outcomes in megaproject portfolios. Drawing on a longitudinal single case-study from a major energy company managing multiple megaprojects, we utilize a mixed-methods approach that includes: 150 hours of participant observation, analysis of 176 documented risks, and nine interviews. Our findings highlight heightened exposure to risk interdependencies on portfolio-level and the critical need for strategic oversight from top management. In response, we introduce a holistic framework that integrates bottom-up project level risk assessment with top-down strategic assessment. This framework enhances transparency, supports alignment with portfolio objectives and enables the organization to manage a cohesive portfolio effectively. For project-based organizations where projects serve as the foundation of corporate strategy, the framework offers a practical tool to manage risk at scale, avoid sub-optimization, and ensure strategic fit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.173
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A holistic framework for portfolio risk management of megaprojects

Haavard Haaskjold, Bassam Hussein, Thomas Tepstad Berge, Bård Atle Hovd et al.
Procedia Computer Science
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

A holistic framework for portfolio risk management of megaprojects

Haavard Haaskjold, Bassam Hussein, Thomas Tepstad Berge, Bård Atle Hovd, Ron Allred
article en

Abstract

The distinctive characteristics of megaproject portfolios, particularly their complexity and interdependencies, shape how risks must be managed. This study explores how portfolio-level risk management activities influence performance outcomes in megaproject portfolios. Drawing on a longitudinal single case-study from a major energy company managing multiple megaprojects, we utilize a mixed-methods approach that includes: 150 hours of participant observation, analysis of 176 documented risks, and nine interviews. Our findings highlight heightened exposure to risk interdependencies on portfolio-level and the critical need for strategic oversight from top management. In response, we introduce a holistic framework that integrates bottom-up project level risk assessment with top-down strategic assessment. This framework enhances transparency, supports alignment with portfolio objectives and enables the organization to manage a cohesive portfolio effectively. For project-based organizations where projects serve as the foundation of corporate strategy, the framework offers a practical tool to manage risk at scale, avoid sub-optimization, and ensure strategic fit.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 278
Aker (Norway) (NO), Aker BP (Norway) (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A holistic framework for portfolio risk management of megaprojects — Haavard Haaskjold, Bassam Hussein, et al. · Procedia Computer Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS