Emotion processing models in individuals with different levels of social anxiety based on the crowd emotion perception task

Previous studies on dyadic face perception have shown that individuals with high social anxiety (HSA) exhibit a strong attentional bias toward threat-related faces. However, it remains unclear whether this bias persists when multiple faces appear simultaneously. The present study combined an average emotion judgment task with event-related potentials (ERP) and functional brain network analysis to examine the temporal dynamics of crowd facial expression processing and the influence of social anxiety. Behaviorally, individuals with HSA identified crowd emotional expressions more accurately than individuals with low social anxiety (LSA). ERP results revealed enhanced late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to angry versus happy crowd faces only in the HSA group, indicating sustained attention to social threat. In contrast, Dual Laplacian Granger Causality Analysis (DLap-GCA) showed stronger frontal-parietal and frontal-occipital connectivity in the LSA group, suggesting more efficient integration of regulatory, attentional, and visual processes during crowd emotion perception. A graph neural network trained on these connectivity features achieved an average accuracy of 87.14% in discriminating anxiety groups. These findings indicate that social anxiety modulates crowd emotion processing through distinct mechanisms: HSA is characterized by amplified threat sensitivity, whereas LSA relies on stronger regulatory network coordination that supports stable and efficient emotional integration in socially threatening contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeuroImage
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121880
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotion processing models in individuals with different levels of social anxiety based on the crowd emotion perception task

NeuroImage
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Emotion processing models in individuals with different levels of social anxiety based on the crowd emotion perception task

article en

Abstract

Previous studies on dyadic face perception have shown that individuals with high social anxiety (HSA) exhibit a strong attentional bias toward threat-related faces. However, it remains unclear whether this bias persists when multiple faces appear simultaneously. The present study combined an average emotion judgment task with event-related potentials (ERP) and functional brain network analysis to examine the temporal dynamics of crowd facial expression processing and the influence of social anxiety. Behaviorally, individuals with HSA identified crowd emotional expressions more accurately than individuals with low social anxiety (LSA). ERP results revealed enhanced late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes to angry versus happy crowd faces only in the HSA group, indicating sustained attention to social threat. In contrast, Dual Laplacian Granger Causality Analysis (DLap-GCA) showed stronger frontal-parietal and frontal-occipital connectivity in the LSA group, suggesting more efficient integration of regulatory, attentional, and visual processes during crowd emotion perception. A graph neural network trained on these connectivity features achieved an average accuracy of 87.14% in discriminating anxiety groups. These findings indicate that social anxiety modulates crowd emotion processing through distinct mechanisms: HSA is characterized by amplified threat sensitivity, whereas LSA relies on stronger regulatory network coordination that supports stable and efficient emotional integration in socially threatening contexts.

NeuroImageVol. 331
Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Liaoning Normal University (CN), Henan Medical University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.