The Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023: A Post-Mortem

Abstract The Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 marks a paradigmatic case of statutory failure: never enforced on the ground and repealed almost immediately. This article seeks to deliver the Act’s funeral oration by conducting a post-mortem that proceeds in three sections (tragedy, hubris, and nemesis). The first posits the Act’s birth as a profound tragedy of voluntarism in UK industrial action law. For all its persistent refusal to recognise a positive right to strike, out of fear that the latter would invite drastic legal restrictions (such as minimum services) as a necessary concessionary trade-off, it succumbed to such restrictions with a negative, immunity-type of protection. However, in its operation, the Act proved a ‘neoliberal hubris’ (a step ‘too far’ for the neoliberal drift of the restriction policy) as it suffered a dual failure (non-enforcement on the ground and almost immediate repeal). Towards accounting for this failure, the second section offers a contestation-based account, as an agency-based alternative to deterministic accounts (which treat the Act’s failure as a predetermined outcome of its unworkable design or its excessive departure from voluntarism). The analysis traces a holistic contestation against the Act at different levels (framing and material) and arenas (jurisprudential, industrial relations and parliamentary) along with critically appraising their effectiveness in bringing about the Act’s demise and deriving broader reflections. The final section considers the prospect of hubris being followed by a ‘neoliberal nemesis’, involving a transformative challenge to the pervasive hold of neoliberal common sense in UK industrial action law. For this evaluation, it critically assesses the potential of the Employment Rights Act 2025 to deliver this nemesis, identifying both substantial advances and severe limitations. It also argues, more broadly, that the Strikes Act 2023 experience strengthens the normative case for revisiting the legal infrastructure of industrial action in favour of recognising a positive right to strike. The section concludes by finding nemesis to be currently suspended and warning of the dangers of another missed window of opportunity for UK industrial action law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Law Journal
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf055
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023: A Post-Mortem

Ioannis Katsaroumpas
Industrial Law Journal
Labor Movements and Unions
article

The Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023: A Post-Mortem

Ioannis Katsaroumpas
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 marks a paradigmatic case of statutory failure: never enforced on the ground and repealed almost immediately. This article seeks to deliver the Act’s funeral oration by conducting a post-mortem that proceeds in three sections (tragedy, hubris, and nemesis). The first posits the Act’s birth as a profound tragedy of voluntarism in UK industrial action law. For all its persistent refusal to recognise a positive right to strike, out of fear that the latter would invite drastic legal restrictions (such as minimum services) as a necessary concessionary trade-off, it succumbed to such restrictions with a negative, immunity-type of protection. However, in its operation, the Act proved a ‘neoliberal hubris’ (a step ‘too far’ for the neoliberal drift of the restriction policy) as it suffered a dual failure (non-enforcement on the ground and almost immediate repeal). Towards accounting for this failure, the second section offers a contestation-based account, as an agency-based alternative to deterministic accounts (which treat the Act’s failure as a predetermined outcome of its unworkable design or its excessive departure from voluntarism). The analysis traces a holistic contestation against the Act at different levels (framing and material) and arenas (jurisprudential, industrial relations and parliamentary) along with critically appraising their effectiveness in bringing about the Act’s demise and deriving broader reflections. The final section considers the prospect of hubris being followed by a ‘neoliberal nemesis’, involving a transformative challenge to the pervasive hold of neoliberal common sense in UK industrial action law. For this evaluation, it critically assesses the potential of the Employment Rights Act 2025 to deliver this nemesis, identifying both substantial advances and severe limitations. It also argues, more broadly, that the Strikes Act 2023 experience strengthens the normative case for revisiting the legal infrastructure of industrial action in favour of recognising a positive right to strike. The section concludes by finding nemesis to be currently suspended and warning of the dangers of another missed window of opportunity for UK industrial action law.

Industrial Law Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.