Foreign Hetairai , Deceitful Rhetoricians, Opportunist Phaselites: The Construction of Metic Ēthos in Forensic Narratives in the Demosthenic Corpus

Abstract: This study explores the moral character ( ēthos ) of metic litigants and non-litigants in select forensic orations of public nature in the Demosthenic corpus and argues the ad hoc socio-economic standing of metics, their legal status, and their occupations were critical factors in constructing elaborate and complex metic portrayals (individual or collective) in forensic narratives. The evidence shows negative portrayals of metic men and women, but metics were not invariably depicted as the malevolent "other." Taking as its starting point the Aristotelian teachings about constructing ēthos in forensic narratives, which ought themselves to be ēthikai , this analysis draws attention to legal status as a critical factor in constructing moral character, and in more nuanced and complex ways than contemporary, 4th-century BCE rhetorical theory would advise. Provided these portrayals were curated to appeal to large panels of citizen dikastai , these rhetorical portrayals of metics in court may shed light on ambivalent Athenian attitudes towards metics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Rhetorica
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2026.a985669
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreign Hetairai , Deceitful Rhetoricians, Opportunist Phaselites: The Construction of Metic Ēthos in Forensic Narratives in the Demosthenic Corpus

Ifigeneia Giannadaki
Rhetorica
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Foreign Hetairai , Deceitful Rhetoricians, Opportunist Phaselites: The Construction of Metic Ēthos in Forensic Narratives in the Demosthenic Corpus

Ifigeneia Giannadaki
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This study explores the moral character ( ēthos ) of metic litigants and non-litigants in select forensic orations of public nature in the Demosthenic corpus and argues the ad hoc socio-economic standing of metics, their legal status, and their occupations were critical factors in constructing elaborate and complex metic portrayals (individual or collective) in forensic narratives. The evidence shows negative portrayals of metic men and women, but metics were not invariably depicted as the malevolent "other." Taking as its starting point the Aristotelian teachings about constructing ēthos in forensic narratives, which ought themselves to be ēthikai , this analysis draws attention to legal status as a critical factor in constructing moral character, and in more nuanced and complex ways than contemporary, 4th-century BCE rhetorical theory would advise. Provided these portrayals were curated to appeal to large panels of citizen dikastai , these rhetorical portrayals of metics in court may shed light on ambivalent Athenian attitudes towards metics.

RhetoricaVol. 44(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Foreign Hetairai , Deceitful Rhetoricians, Opportunist Phaselites: The Construction of Metic Ēthos in Forensic Narratives in the Demosthenic Corpus — Ifigeneia Giannadaki · Rhetorica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS