A practical framework for physicians and researchers to assess diagnostic bronchoscopy technologies in lung cancer

This review summarizes these methodologic advances and provides a practical framework for clinicians to critically appraise diagnostic bronchoscopy studies, compare technologies, and apply results to individual patients with suspected lung cancer. Emphasis is placed on appropriate reference standards, recognition of bronchoscopy as a multi-disease test, and the superiority of disease specific sensitivity over diagnostic yield for cross-study comparisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000001271
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A practical framework for physicians and researchers to assess diagnostic bronchoscopy technologies in lung cancer

David E. Ost
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A practical framework for physicians and researchers to assess diagnostic bronchoscopy technologies in lung cancer

David E. Ost
article en

Abstract

This review summarizes these methodologic advances and provides a practical framework for clinicians to critically appraise diagnostic bronchoscopy studies, compare technologies, and apply results to individual patients with suspected lung cancer. Emphasis is placed on appropriate reference standards, recognition of bronchoscopy as a multi-disease test, and the superiority of disease specific sensitivity over diagnostic yield for cross-study comparisons.

Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.