Time in project portfolio management: Objective, subjective, and contextual

Time has been considered as a key success criterion and a constraint demanding prioritization between projects. It also creates competition among the projects in a portfolio and tensions across time horizons in portfolio decision-making. Thus far, research on project portfolios and their management has treated time only implicitly and secondarily. The purpose of this conceptual study is to investigate the relevance, meaning, and future possibilities of time in project portfolio management research. The relevance and treatment of time is first covered generally in project and management studies, to guide the conceptual analysis of project portfolio management research. Then, the objective, subjective, and contextual considerations of time in project portfolio management are mapped to summarize extant threads of research. The findings offer novel ways to conceptualize project portfolio management and reveal the connectedness of objective, subjective, and contextual views of time as a central driver of dynamics in project portfolio management. This study suggests supplementing and combining the mechanism, practice, and actor-centric project portfolio management studies with those concerned with time. Future research avenues are proposed both combining the objective, subjective, and contextual views as well as treating each view separately. • Time has been treated implicitly in project portfolio management research. • Time can be viewed from objective, subjective, and contextual viewpoints. • In project portfolio management, the objective view of time dominates. • Time can complement mechanism, practice, and actor-centric portfolio research. • Time-centric research stream is central for understanding portfolio dynamics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Leadership and Society
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2026.100221
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time in project portfolio management: Objective, subjective, and contextual

Project Leadership and Society
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Time in project portfolio management: Objective, subjective, and contextual

article en

Abstract

Time has been considered as a key success criterion and a constraint demanding prioritization between projects. It also creates competition among the projects in a portfolio and tensions across time horizons in portfolio decision-making. Thus far, research on project portfolios and their management has treated time only implicitly and secondarily. The purpose of this conceptual study is to investigate the relevance, meaning, and future possibilities of time in project portfolio management research. The relevance and treatment of time is first covered generally in project and management studies, to guide the conceptual analysis of project portfolio management research. Then, the objective, subjective, and contextual considerations of time in project portfolio management are mapped to summarize extant threads of research. The findings offer novel ways to conceptualize project portfolio management and reveal the connectedness of objective, subjective, and contextual views of time as a central driver of dynamics in project portfolio management. This study suggests supplementing and combining the mechanism, practice, and actor-centric project portfolio management studies with those concerned with time. Future research avenues are proposed both combining the objective, subjective, and contextual views as well as treating each view separately. • Time has been treated implicitly in project portfolio management research. • Time can be viewed from objective, subjective, and contextual viewpoints. • In project portfolio management, the objective view of time dominates. • Time can complement mechanism, practice, and actor-centric portfolio research. • Time-centric research stream is central for understanding portfolio dynamics.

Project Leadership and SocietyVol. 7
University of Turku (FI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.