Will the Truth Free Us from Misinformation?

We study the impact of truthful revelation mechanisms, like fact checking, on the incentives for media outlets to produce misinformation. The existing literature suggests that such interventions will always reduce this incentive. In this paper, we consider a context in which consumers benefit both, and to varying degrees, from the truth contained in news reports and from sharing, discussing, and reacting to news stories that, independent of their truthful content, reinforce and enhance their social identity. In such a setting, we find that truthful revelation will not always decrease, and may in fact increase, the incentives for biased reporting. We identify two distinct mechanisms behind this effect. First, we show that truthful revelation may improve the ability of a biased media outlet to signal its type to consumers. Second, we find that heterogeneous preferences for misinformation endow the outlet with a demand function that may imply an increase or decrease in the incentives to produce biased news due to the stochasticity implied by the fact checking process. Finally, we provide two empirical examples that offer results that are consistent with the idea that media outlets are unlikely to reduce, and may increase, bias when they expect the truth to be revealed imminently. This paper was accepted by Raphael Thomadsen, marketing. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03896 .

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03896
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will the Truth Free Us from Misinformation?

Management Science
Media Influence and Politics
article

Will the Truth Free Us from Misinformation?

article en

Abstract

We study the impact of truthful revelation mechanisms, like fact checking, on the incentives for media outlets to produce misinformation. The existing literature suggests that such interventions will always reduce this incentive. In this paper, we consider a context in which consumers benefit both, and to varying degrees, from the truth contained in news reports and from sharing, discussing, and reacting to news stories that, independent of their truthful content, reinforce and enhance their social identity. In such a setting, we find that truthful revelation will not always decrease, and may in fact increase, the incentives for biased reporting. We identify two distinct mechanisms behind this effect. First, we show that truthful revelation may improve the ability of a biased media outlet to signal its type to consumers. Second, we find that heterogeneous preferences for misinformation endow the outlet with a demand function that may imply an increase or decrease in the incentives to produce biased news due to the stochasticity implied by the fact checking process. Finally, we provide two empirical examples that offer results that are consistent with the idea that media outlets are unlikely to reduce, and may increase, bias when they expect the truth to be revealed imminently. This paper was accepted by Raphael Thomadsen, marketing. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03896 .

Management Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.