Structural dilemmas of PeaceTech: AI, power, and peacebuilding in the digital age

PeaceTech, the use of AI and other digital technologies in peacebuilding, is often praised as a transformative approach to conflict prevention and dialogue. Yet the field remains conceptually vague and ethically fraught. Tools meant to empower communities can also enable surveillance when crowdsourced data exposes vulnerable groups. Innovation is often constrained by legacy institutions that collect data but lack the capacity to interpret or act on it. AI powered platforms may increase visibility, but early warning alerts frequently fail to produce effective responses. At the same time, corporate control over infrastructures such as cloud services and satellite internet raises concerns about the public good, while globally designed systems often clash with local realities and reinforce digital colonialism. Drawing on scholarship and practitioner insights, this article argues that these are structural rather than accidental problems. It calls for guardrails including service continuity, community data ownership, algorithmic accountability, and response protocols tied to funding, solidarity, and justice.

Publication Details

Journal
Peacebuilding
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2026.2644694
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural dilemmas of PeaceTech: AI, power, and peacebuilding in the digital age

Peacebuilding
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Structural dilemmas of PeaceTech: AI, power, and peacebuilding in the digital age

article en

Abstract

PeaceTech, the use of AI and other digital technologies in peacebuilding, is often praised as a transformative approach to conflict prevention and dialogue. Yet the field remains conceptually vague and ethically fraught. Tools meant to empower communities can also enable surveillance when crowdsourced data exposes vulnerable groups. Innovation is often constrained by legacy institutions that collect data but lack the capacity to interpret or act on it. AI powered platforms may increase visibility, but early warning alerts frequently fail to produce effective responses. At the same time, corporate control over infrastructures such as cloud services and satellite internet raises concerns about the public good, while globally designed systems often clash with local realities and reinforce digital colonialism. Drawing on scholarship and practitioner insights, this article argues that these are structural rather than accidental problems. It calls for guardrails including service continuity, community data ownership, algorithmic accountability, and response protocols tied to funding, solidarity, and justice.

Peacebuilding
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.