Americans’ Responses to COVID-19 and the Conditional Role of Dispositional Needs for Security: A Replication and Extension

Abstract A predominant theory in political psychology proposes that the political right is more threat sensitive than the political left due to differences in needs for security. Yet, in a prototypical case study of the threat-politics link, Americans’ responses to COVID-19 deviated from this expectation. In this research note, we demonstrate that this phenomenon can be understood by accounting for the role of partisan sorting and political engagement in translating dispositional needs for security into political preferences. Across six national surveys (combined N = 8,687), we demonstrate that psychological needs for security are indeed associated with protective COVID-19 responses, but only among politically disengaged Americans. For politically engaged Americans, increased security needs were associated with sorting into right-wing discourses that, in turn, promoted lax COVID-19 responses. Our findings demonstrate that dispositional security needs conditionally affect political attitudes but cast doubt on the claim that attitudinal differences will necessarily manifest behaviorally.

Publication Details

Journal
Public Opinion Quarterly
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfag016
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Americans’ Responses to COVID-19 and the Conditional Role of Dispositional Needs for Security: A Replication and Extension

Public Opinion Quarterly
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Americans’ Responses to COVID-19 and the Conditional Role of Dispositional Needs for Security: A Replication and Extension

article en

Abstract

Abstract A predominant theory in political psychology proposes that the political right is more threat sensitive than the political left due to differences in needs for security. Yet, in a prototypical case study of the threat-politics link, Americans’ responses to COVID-19 deviated from this expectation. In this research note, we demonstrate that this phenomenon can be understood by accounting for the role of partisan sorting and political engagement in translating dispositional needs for security into political preferences. Across six national surveys (combined N = 8,687), we demonstrate that psychological needs for security are indeed associated with protective COVID-19 responses, but only among politically disengaged Americans. For politically engaged Americans, increased security needs were associated with sorting into right-wing discourses that, in turn, promoted lax COVID-19 responses. Our findings demonstrate that dispositional security needs conditionally affect political attitudes but cast doubt on the claim that attitudinal differences will necessarily manifest behaviorally.

Public Opinion Quarterly
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.