Hybrid Common Femoral Vein Endophlebectomy and Iliac Vein Stenting Versus Femoro-Femoral Venous Bypass for Management of Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Occlusion

Both CFV endophlebectomy with iliac vein stenting and femoro-femoral venous bypass were feasible, safe, and effective treatment strategies for chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion with compromised venous inflow. Hybrid reconstruction represented a less invasive strategy, as reflected by shorter operative time and reduced hospital stay. This approach was associated with greater improvement in clinical outcome scores and preserved the feasibility of endovascular reintervention.Clinical ImpactBoth hybrid reconstruction and femoro-femoral venous bypass are associated with meaningful improvements in quality-of-life measures in selected patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction and compromised venous inflow. Although improvements across clinical and patient-reported outcome scores were greater following the hybrid approach, femoro-femoral cross-over bypass remains a valuable bailout technique in cases where endovascular or hybrid intervention fails or is not possible.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261428269
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Common Femoral Vein Endophlebectomy and Iliac Vein Stenting Versus Femoro-Femoral Venous Bypass for Management of Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Occlusion

Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Hybrid Common Femoral Vein Endophlebectomy and Iliac Vein Stenting Versus Femoro-Femoral Venous Bypass for Management of Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Occlusion

article en

Abstract

Both CFV endophlebectomy with iliac vein stenting and femoro-femoral venous bypass were feasible, safe, and effective treatment strategies for chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion with compromised venous inflow. Hybrid reconstruction represented a less invasive strategy, as reflected by shorter operative time and reduced hospital stay. This approach was associated with greater improvement in clinical outcome scores and preserved the feasibility of endovascular reintervention.Clinical ImpactBoth hybrid reconstruction and femoro-femoral venous bypass are associated with meaningful improvements in quality-of-life measures in selected patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction and compromised venous inflow. Although improvements across clinical and patient-reported outcome scores were greater following the hybrid approach, femoro-femoral cross-over bypass remains a valuable bailout technique in cases where endovascular or hybrid intervention fails or is not possible.

Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.