Multi-route choice model of urban rail transit considering decision inertia

Multi-route operation is a key feature of the networked operation system in China's urban rail transit. Investigating passengers' travel choice behavior under such conditions is crucial for understanding passenger travel patterns of and meeting diverse travel demands. Based on minimum-regret theory, this study incorporates the passenger heterogeneity in the perception of route attributes to construct a multi-scale hybrid utility-regret model that integrates utility maximization and regret minimization mechanisms. This model addresses the decision-making deviation between predicted passengers' travel behavior by traditional models and their actual travel behavior, a discrepancy arising from the passengers' route familiarity. By integrating tolerance thresholds and decision inertia, we propose a modeling approach for multi-route travel choice and estimate model parameters and validate performance using stated preference (SP) survey data from a representative case. The results show that passengers exhibit a tolerance threshold of 6.98 minutes for travel time attribute. Compared with the benchmark model, the proposed model demonstrates superior performance in terms of log-likelihood, Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and hit rate, thereby confirming its stronger data-fitting capability. Furthermore, the analysis of willingness-to-pay reveals that passengers are willing to accept additional time costs for improved service quality, confirming the model's effectiveness and practical applicability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF SHENZHEN UNIVERSITY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1249.2026.01047
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-route choice model of urban rail transit considering decision inertia

Yangyang Y. Yang, Xinyu Zhu, Dejie Xu, Liang GONG et al.
JOURNAL OF SHENZHEN UNIVERSITY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

Multi-route choice model of urban rail transit considering decision inertia

Yangyang Y. Yang, Xinyu Zhu, Dejie Xu, Liang GONG, Chenhao HU
article en

Abstract

Multi-route operation is a key feature of the networked operation system in China's urban rail transit. Investigating passengers' travel choice behavior under such conditions is crucial for understanding passenger travel patterns of and meeting diverse travel demands. Based on minimum-regret theory, this study incorporates the passenger heterogeneity in the perception of route attributes to construct a multi-scale hybrid utility-regret model that integrates utility maximization and regret minimization mechanisms. This model addresses the decision-making deviation between predicted passengers' travel behavior by traditional models and their actual travel behavior, a discrepancy arising from the passengers' route familiarity. By integrating tolerance thresholds and decision inertia, we propose a modeling approach for multi-route travel choice and estimate model parameters and validate performance using stated preference (SP) survey data from a representative case. The results show that passengers exhibit a tolerance threshold of 6.98 minutes for travel time attribute. Compared with the benchmark model, the proposed model demonstrates superior performance in terms of log-likelihood, Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and hit rate, thereby confirming its stronger data-fitting capability. Furthermore, the analysis of willingness-to-pay reveals that passengers are willing to accept additional time costs for improved service quality, confirming the model's effectiveness and practical applicability.

JOURNAL OF SHENZHEN UNIVERSITY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGVol. 43(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.