Visitation and non-wood product collection in Slovak forests in comparison with Czechia

This article explores forest visitation and the collection of mushrooms and wild forest fruits in Slovakia from 2020 to 2024, comparing these trends with harmonized data from Czechia, a closely related country in Central Europe. Utilizing nationally representative repeated cross-sectional surveys (Slovakia, N = 5,129; Czechia, N = 5,026), we assess participation rates, harvest intensities, and the inequality in the distribution of collected quantities through descriptive statistics, Lorenz curves, and Gini coefficients. In Slovakia, 48% of adults reported visiting forests only occasionally, while 27.6% indicated no visits at all; in contrast, participation was consistently higher in Czechia, where nearly 70% of adults were regular visitors. On average, 30.3% of Slovak adults collected mushrooms, and 14.5% gathered wild fruits, with a pronounced concentration among a small number of highly active collectors (Gini: mushrooms 0.84; fruits 0.95). This contrasts with lower inequality in Czechia (0.67; 0.76). Regional differences within Slovakia reflect the distribution of forest cover and accessibility, with the highest levels of both visitation and collection observed in the Žilinský and Banskobystrický regions. These findings indicate that, despite the legal framework allowing open access, forest recreation and foraging are socially selective in practice. They also provide an empirical foundation for communication, education, and green-infrastructure initiatives aimed at engaging younger and urban residents, thereby promoting more equitable access to forest-based benefits.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1792106
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visitation and non-wood product collection in Slovak forests in comparison with Czechia

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Forest Management and Policy
article

Visitation and non-wood product collection in Slovak forests in comparison with Czechia

article en

Abstract

This article explores forest visitation and the collection of mushrooms and wild forest fruits in Slovakia from 2020 to 2024, comparing these trends with harmonized data from Czechia, a closely related country in Central Europe. Utilizing nationally representative repeated cross-sectional surveys (Slovakia, N = 5,129; Czechia, N = 5,026), we assess participation rates, harvest intensities, and the inequality in the distribution of collected quantities through descriptive statistics, Lorenz curves, and Gini coefficients. In Slovakia, 48% of adults reported visiting forests only occasionally, while 27.6% indicated no visits at all; in contrast, participation was consistently higher in Czechia, where nearly 70% of adults were regular visitors. On average, 30.3% of Slovak adults collected mushrooms, and 14.5% gathered wild fruits, with a pronounced concentration among a small number of highly active collectors (Gini: mushrooms 0.84; fruits 0.95). This contrasts with lower inequality in Czechia (0.67; 0.76). Regional differences within Slovakia reflect the distribution of forest cover and accessibility, with the highest levels of both visitation and collection observed in the Žilinský and Banskobystrický regions. These findings indicate that, despite the legal framework allowing open access, forest recreation and foraging are socially selective in practice. They also provide an empirical foundation for communication, education, and green-infrastructure initiatives aimed at engaging younger and urban residents, thereby promoting more equitable access to forest-based benefits.

Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsVol. 10
Landscape Institute (GB), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), National Forest Centre (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.