Renormalisation as Admissibility Compression: A Structural Interpretation within the Paton System

This paper presents a structural interpretation of renormalisation within the Paton System framework. Rather than treating renormalisation as a purely mathematical technique for managing divergences, it is interpreted as admissibility compression across scale. Physical systems exhibit scale-dependent constraint structures, and renormalisation corresponds to the filtering of non-admissible configurations while preserving invariant structure. Scale transformations reduce degrees of freedom while maintaining configurations that satisfy governing constraints. Renormalisation group flow is therefore understood as navigation through admissible structure across scale, and fixed points correspond to scale-invariant admissible configurations. Divergences are interpreted as violations of admissibility that are removed through constraint-compatible reparameterisation. This interpretation introduces no new physical ontology and does not modify existing renormalisation procedures. It provides a pre-theoretical structural lens aligning renormalisation with admissibility-based system continuation across domains.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19198716
Primary Topic
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Renormalisation as Admissibility Compression: A Structural Interpretation within the Paton System

Andrew John Paton
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
article

Renormalisation as Admissibility Compression: A Structural Interpretation within the Paton System

Andrew John Paton
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a structural interpretation of renormalisation within the Paton System framework. Rather than treating renormalisation as a purely mathematical technique for managing divergences, it is interpreted as admissibility compression across scale. Physical systems exhibit scale-dependent constraint structures, and renormalisation corresponds to the filtering of non-admissible configurations while preserving invariant structure. Scale transformations reduce degrees of freedom while maintaining configurations that satisfy governing constraints. Renormalisation group flow is therefore understood as navigation through admissible structure across scale, and fixed points correspond to scale-invariant admissible configurations. Divergences are interpreted as violations of admissibility that are removed through constraint-compatible reparameterisation. This interpretation introduces no new physical ontology and does not modify existing renormalisation procedures. It provides a pre-theoretical structural lens aligning renormalisation with admissibility-based system continuation across domains.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.