Toward an Emergent Paradigm for Neurodiversity and Health

Autism research has developed through multiple paradigms. Medical models locate difficulty within individual neurology, while social and neurodiversity models emphasize environmental barriers and the legitimacy of cognitive variation. Biopsychosocial and hybrid approaches integrate these perspectives, recognizing that biological, psychological, and social factors all matter. Yet these frameworks remain largely descriptive and offer limited accounts of how these domains dynamically interact across development to produce the wide heterogeneity observed in autistic experience and adult outcomes. This paper introduces the Evolutionary Stress Framework (ESF), a complexity-based model that reframes neurodevelopmental variation as the emergent outcome of stress–energy regulation and predictive processing over time. Drawing on stress physiology, adaptive calibration theory, predictive processing, and disability scholarship, we review traditional medical, social, biopsychosocial, and hybrid models; examine the contributions and limits of the neurodiversity paradigm; and articulate ESF’s core constructs: emergent neurotypes, stress incoherence, and emergent allostasis. Within ESF, autistic traits function as coherent, context-dependent stress–energy strategies rather than separable strengths and deficits. ESF conceptualizes pathology not as deviation from a normative baseline but as stress incoherence—states in which long-standing calibrations become unsustainable under current environmental conditions. This framework helps explain heterogeneity, developmental change, the clustering of physical and mental health conditions, and the disproportionate burden of burnout and health disparities observed in autistic adulthood. ESF shifts intervention targets from trait suppression to environmental design, co-regulation, and individualized support organized around bio-neurotype–specific regulatory needs. We outline implications for research, clinical practice, and policy and identify directions for empirically operationalizing ESF constructs.

Publication Details

Journal
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25739581261433443
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward an Emergent Paradigm for Neurodiversity and Health

Autism in Adulthood
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Toward an Emergent Paradigm for Neurodiversity and Health

article en

Abstract

Autism research has developed through multiple paradigms. Medical models locate difficulty within individual neurology, while social and neurodiversity models emphasize environmental barriers and the legitimacy of cognitive variation. Biopsychosocial and hybrid approaches integrate these perspectives, recognizing that biological, psychological, and social factors all matter. Yet these frameworks remain largely descriptive and offer limited accounts of how these domains dynamically interact across development to produce the wide heterogeneity observed in autistic experience and adult outcomes. This paper introduces the Evolutionary Stress Framework (ESF), a complexity-based model that reframes neurodevelopmental variation as the emergent outcome of stress–energy regulation and predictive processing over time. Drawing on stress physiology, adaptive calibration theory, predictive processing, and disability scholarship, we review traditional medical, social, biopsychosocial, and hybrid models; examine the contributions and limits of the neurodiversity paradigm; and articulate ESF’s core constructs: emergent neurotypes, stress incoherence, and emergent allostasis. Within ESF, autistic traits function as coherent, context-dependent stress–energy strategies rather than separable strengths and deficits. ESF conceptualizes pathology not as deviation from a normative baseline but as stress incoherence—states in which long-standing calibrations become unsustainable under current environmental conditions. This framework helps explain heterogeneity, developmental change, the clustering of physical and mental health conditions, and the disproportionate burden of burnout and health disparities observed in autistic adulthood. ESF shifts intervention targets from trait suppression to environmental design, co-regulation, and individualized support organized around bio-neurotype–specific regulatory needs. We outline implications for research, clinical practice, and policy and identify directions for empirically operationalizing ESF constructs.

Autism in Adulthood
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.