Performance evaluation of an adalimumab biosimilar autoinjector and its reference device: comparative use human factors study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis

A Comparative Use Human Factors study was conducted to assess whether the injection success rate (SR) with biosimilar adalimumab-fkjp (Bios-ADA) autoinjector (Hulio®) is comparable to reference adalimumab (Ref-ADA) autoinjector (Humira®), accounting for design differences, including the absence of an activation button, to evaluate usability in the target patient population. A counterbalanced, multicenter study was conducted under simulated conditions, with patients completing multiple steps to administer the medication (40 mg Bios-ADA or Ref-ADA) into an injection pad using both devices. The endpoint was the overall SR for completing critical delivery system tasks with each device. A total of 55 patients (50 adults with rheumatoid arthritis and five patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and/or pediatric Crohn's disease) were enrolled. The overall SR for patients using the Bios-ADA autoinjector and the Ref-ADA was 92.7% (51/55) and 87.3% (48/55), respectively. Four and seven use errors were observed with the Bios-ADA and Ref-ADA autoinjectors, respectively. Bios-ADA autoinjector was non-inferior to Ref-ADA autoinjector, and design differences did not introduce clinically significant use-related risks. The Bios-ADA autoinjector can be used as a practical alternative to the Ref-ADA autoinjector from a usability perspective, with comparable overall performance during self-administration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Delivery
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2026.2649991
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance evaluation of an adalimumab biosimilar autoinjector and its reference device: comparative use human factors study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Drug Delivery
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Performance evaluation of an adalimumab biosimilar autoinjector and its reference device: comparative use human factors study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis

article en

Abstract

A Comparative Use Human Factors study was conducted to assess whether the injection success rate (SR) with biosimilar adalimumab-fkjp (Bios-ADA) autoinjector (Hulio®) is comparable to reference adalimumab (Ref-ADA) autoinjector (Humira®), accounting for design differences, including the absence of an activation button, to evaluate usability in the target patient population. A counterbalanced, multicenter study was conducted under simulated conditions, with patients completing multiple steps to administer the medication (40 mg Bios-ADA or Ref-ADA) into an injection pad using both devices. The endpoint was the overall SR for completing critical delivery system tasks with each device. A total of 55 patients (50 adults with rheumatoid arthritis and five patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and/or pediatric Crohn's disease) were enrolled. The overall SR for patients using the Bios-ADA autoinjector and the Ref-ADA was 92.7% (51/55) and 87.3% (48/55), respectively. Four and seven use errors were observed with the Bios-ADA and Ref-ADA autoinjectors, respectively. Bios-ADA autoinjector was non-inferior to Ref-ADA autoinjector, and design differences did not introduce clinically significant use-related risks. The Bios-ADA autoinjector can be used as a practical alternative to the Ref-ADA autoinjector from a usability perspective, with comparable overall performance during self-administration.

Drug DeliveryVol. 33(1)
Biocon (Switzerland) (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.