From Fragmentation to Integration: Finding the Psychological and Instrumental Common Ground for Algorithmic Management and Marketing

Algorithmic systems shape both organizational management and marketing, yet their effects on employees and consumers are rarely studied together. This fragmentation obscures a critical insight: these stakeholders are interconnected, with employee experiences cascading to consumers and consumer feedback looping back to employees. Drawing on stakeholder theory and value-sensitive design, we develop an integrated framework explaining how algorithmic management and marketing jointly affect stakeholder well-being. We theorize bidirectional spillover mechanisms that produce either negative spirals—where controlling algorithms reduce employee engagement, degrade service quality, and frustrate consumers—or positive synergies—where supportive algorithms enhance well-being across both groups. Sustainable value creation, therefore, requires multi-stakeholder algorithmic governance that optimizes joint employee-consumer outcomes rather than single-stakeholder maximization. We propose a multi-level governance architecture integrating ethics boards, value-sensitive development teams, and stakeholder voice mechanisms to guide organizations in designing algorithms that serve multiple stakeholders simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Sciences
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16110540
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Fragmentation to Integration: Finding the Psychological and Instrumental Common Ground for Algorithmic Management and Marketing

Guorong Zhu, Zheni Wang, Emma Wang
3 links
Administrative Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

From Fragmentation to Integration: Finding the Psychological and Instrumental Common Ground for Algorithmic Management and Marketing

Guorong Zhu, Zheni Wang, Emma Wang
article en

Abstract

Algorithmic systems shape both organizational management and marketing, yet their effects on employees and consumers are rarely studied together. This fragmentation obscures a critical insight: these stakeholders are interconnected, with employee experiences cascading to consumers and consumer feedback looping back to employees. Drawing on stakeholder theory and value-sensitive design, we develop an integrated framework explaining how algorithmic management and marketing jointly affect stakeholder well-being. We theorize bidirectional spillover mechanisms that produce either negative spirals—where controlling algorithms reduce employee engagement, degrade service quality, and frustrate consumers—or positive synergies—where supportive algorithms enhance well-being across both groups. Sustainable value creation, therefore, requires multi-stakeholder algorithmic governance that optimizes joint employee-consumer outcomes rather than single-stakeholder maximization. We propose a multi-level governance architecture integrating ethics boards, value-sensitive development teams, and stakeholder voice mechanisms to guide organizations in designing algorithms that serve multiple stakeholders simultaneously.

Administrative SciencesVol. 16(11)
Southern Connecticut State University (US), Salem State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon