Irredeemable Evildoers as Post-Persons

This article argues that certain irredeemable evildoers qualify—at least in some cases—as post-persons under certain normative accounts of personhood. Post-persons are conventionally understood as individuals who, due to injury, sickness, or cognitive decline, no longer meet the criteria for personhood where personhood is understood in terms of certain cognitive capacities. However, this article extends the concept to cases of moral failure in a way that has hitherto been neglected in the debate. Drawing on a Kantian-Arendtian conception of personhood, it argues that personhood includes not just rational or cognitive capacities, but moral reasoning and the capacity for remorse. Irredeemable evildoers—those whose actions are profoundly cruel and who persistently reject accountability—may forfeit their moral standing as persons. This shift from biological to moral criteria has serious implications for how we understand and treat such individuals.

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Social Criticism
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537261434944
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Irredeemable Evildoers as Post-Persons

Philosophy & Social Criticism
Free Will and Agency
article

Irredeemable Evildoers as Post-Persons

article en

Abstract

This article argues that certain irredeemable evildoers qualify—at least in some cases—as post-persons under certain normative accounts of personhood. Post-persons are conventionally understood as individuals who, due to injury, sickness, or cognitive decline, no longer meet the criteria for personhood where personhood is understood in terms of certain cognitive capacities. However, this article extends the concept to cases of moral failure in a way that has hitherto been neglected in the debate. Drawing on a Kantian-Arendtian conception of personhood, it argues that personhood includes not just rational or cognitive capacities, but moral reasoning and the capacity for remorse. Irredeemable evildoers—those whose actions are profoundly cruel and who persistently reject accountability—may forfeit their moral standing as persons. This shift from biological to moral criteria has serious implications for how we understand and treat such individuals.

Philosophy & Social Criticism
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.