Multi-stakeholder use of patient experience data (PED): current state and future opportunities for the application of PED to inform decision-making

Patient experience data (PED) encompass information on patient’s experiences, disease impact, and treatment preferences. PED are critical inputs to the drug development process and help ensure medicines are developed with the interests of patients in mind. The authors (all members of the Industry Special Interest Group and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement Special Interest Group of the International Society for Quality of Life Research) have conducted a scoping review of how regulatory agencies, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, private payers, clinicians, and patients currently use PED for decision-making. Recommendations are provided to address key challenges influencing multi-stakeholder use of PED.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01030-3
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-stakeholder use of patient experience data (PED): current state and future opportunities for the application of PED to inform decision-making

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Multi-stakeholder use of patient experience data (PED): current state and future opportunities for the application of PED to inform decision-making

article en

Abstract

Patient experience data (PED) encompass information on patient’s experiences, disease impact, and treatment preferences. PED are critical inputs to the drug development process and help ensure medicines are developed with the interests of patients in mind. The authors (all members of the Industry Special Interest Group and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement Special Interest Group of the International Society for Quality of Life Research) have conducted a scoping review of how regulatory agencies, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, private payers, clinicians, and patients currently use PED for decision-making. Recommendations are provided to address key challenges influencing multi-stakeholder use of PED.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
University of Geneva (CH), Pharmaceutical Product Development (United States) (US), Ritsumeikan University (JP), University of Shiga Prefecture (JP), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), AbbVie (United States) (US), Otsuka (United States) (US), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Novartis (United States) (US), Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (FR), UCB Pharma (United Kingdom) (GB), AstraZeneca (United States) (US), IQ Solutions (US), University of Sunderland (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-stakeholder use of patient experience data (PED): current state and future opportunities for the application of PED to inform decision-making · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS