Optimization and Dynamic Modeling of Friction Losses in Reciprocating Diesel Engines with Emphasis on Rod-Crank Geometry and Ring-Cylinder Contact

Abstract This technical report presents a physics-based model to quantify frictional power losses in a reciprocating diesel engine, focusing on the effects of the connecting-rod-to-crank-radius ratio (L/r) and piston-ring contact area. Simulations were performed for three L/r ratios (2.43, 3.2, and 3.59) and three ring configurations: a single 1.25 mm ring; two rings of 1.25 mm and 1.5 mm; and three rings of 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.5 mm. Results indicate that frictional power increases with contact area, from 102W (single ring, L/r = 3.59) to 326W (three rings, L/r = 2.43). Shorter rods amplify lateral forces and friction, whereas longer rods reduce losses with diminishing returns. Normalization against the baseline two-ring case (187W) highlights these trends. The model identifies an optimal configuration at a moderate L/r ratio with two rings of balanced thickness, minimizing energy loss while maintaining ring durability and sealing performance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tribology
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071486
Primary Topic
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization and Dynamic Modeling of Friction Losses in Reciprocating Diesel Engines with Emphasis on Rod-Crank Geometry and Ring-Cylinder Contact

Journal of Tribology
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
article

Optimization and Dynamic Modeling of Friction Losses in Reciprocating Diesel Engines with Emphasis on Rod-Crank Geometry and Ring-Cylinder Contact

article en

Abstract

Abstract This technical report presents a physics-based model to quantify frictional power losses in a reciprocating diesel engine, focusing on the effects of the connecting-rod-to-crank-radius ratio (L/r) and piston-ring contact area. Simulations were performed for three L/r ratios (2.43, 3.2, and 3.59) and three ring configurations: a single 1.25 mm ring; two rings of 1.25 mm and 1.5 mm; and three rings of 1.25 mm, 1.5 mm, and 1.5 mm. Results indicate that frictional power increases with contact area, from 102W (single ring, L/r = 3.59) to 326W (three rings, L/r = 2.43). Shorter rods amplify lateral forces and friction, whereas longer rods reduce losses with diminishing returns. Normalization against the baseline two-ring case (187W) highlights these trends. The model identifies an optimal configuration at a moderate L/r ratio with two rings of balanced thickness, minimizing energy loss while maintaining ring durability and sealing performance.

Journal of Tribology
University of Bologna (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.