Global Inequalities in Stroke Rehabilitation: System Capacity, Workforce, and Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

This review examines global inequalities in stroke rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It aims to identify key system-level determinants, including access to services, workforce capacity, financing, and policy frameworks—that contribute to disparities in post-stroke rehabilitation and long-term outcomes. Recent research demonstrates a growing mismatch between rehabilitation needs and service availability in LMICs. Persistent barriers include severe shortages of trained rehabilitation professionals, inadequate infrastructure, fragmented care pathways, and high out-of-pocket expenditures. Although task shifting, community-based rehabilitation, family-mediated therapy, and telerehabilitation have been introduced to mitigate these gaps, evidence for their scalability and sustained effectiveness remains heterogeneous. Stroke rehabilitation inequities in LMICs primarily reflect structural health system constraints rather than lack of therapeutic efficacy. Sustainable improvement requires integration of rehabilitation into universal health coverage, investment in workforce development, and strengthened post-acute care pathways. These findings highlight priorities for future implementation and health system research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-026-00535-8
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Inequalities in Stroke Rehabilitation: System Capacity, Workforce, and Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Global Inequalities in Stroke Rehabilitation: System Capacity, Workforce, and Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

article en

Abstract

This review examines global inequalities in stroke rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It aims to identify key system-level determinants, including access to services, workforce capacity, financing, and policy frameworks—that contribute to disparities in post-stroke rehabilitation and long-term outcomes. Recent research demonstrates a growing mismatch between rehabilitation needs and service availability in LMICs. Persistent barriers include severe shortages of trained rehabilitation professionals, inadequate infrastructure, fragmented care pathways, and high out-of-pocket expenditures. Although task shifting, community-based rehabilitation, family-mediated therapy, and telerehabilitation have been introduced to mitigate these gaps, evidence for their scalability and sustained effectiveness remains heterogeneous. Stroke rehabilitation inequities in LMICs primarily reflect structural health system constraints rather than lack of therapeutic efficacy. Sustainable improvement requires integration of rehabilitation into universal health coverage, investment in workforce development, and strengthened post-acute care pathways. These findings highlight priorities for future implementation and health system research.

Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ReportsVol. 14(1)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.