Impacts of shrub coverage for arctic ecosystem carbon uptake and storage

Abstract. Although shrubs employ distinct water- and carbon-use strategies compared to trees and are increasingly expanding across warming tundra and grassland, they remain insufficiently represented in global land surface models. Here, we incorporated two shrub types, deciduous and evergreen, into the nutrient-enabled terrestrial biosphere model QUINCY, which features a state-of-the-art treatment of soil nutrient dynamics and carbon exchange. We investigate the change in carbon fluxes and storage due to shrub cover, it's response to climate and CO2 fertilization effect and the role of nitrogen availability. With this new implementation, shrubs showed reasonable seasonal cycle of gross primary production (GPP) at 50 % of the Arctic study sites. The model achieved mean R2 values of 0.5 and 0.6, when compared with in situ measurements and remote sensing products for modeled shrubs. However, at 50 % of the study sites the model underestimated observed GPP due to too strong simulated nitrogen limitation. Compared to needle leaved evergreen forest the modeled gross primary production of shrubs is similarly distributed with a non-significant difference in the median. Compared to graminoids the carbon fluxes of shrubs are 40 % higher. Shrubs produce a substantial, though lower, above-ground biomass than needle leaved trees and show phenological patterns that are distinct from those of trees. Although CO2 fertilization generally benefits all plant types, shrubs appear to maintain a particularly strong growth response under elevated CO2 concentrations. We also demonstrated that the modeled deciduous shrubs reduce their nitrogen sources substantially more than evergreen shrubs, generally resulting in a 50 % decrease in gross primary production. Providing the plants with unlimited nitrogen and thus doubling gross primary production at most sites improved the model-measurement agreement by 15 %. A similar effect occurred when initializing nitrogen and carbon contents best on permafrost profiles, resulting in partly alleviating nitrogen limitation in the model. These finding underlines the importance of including evergreen and deciduous shrub PFTs in global land surface models to accurately predict ongoing changes in the Arctic carbon cycle. However, the strong nitrogen limitation of Arctic shrub productivity when using the standard model parametrizations suggests that the Arctic contribution to global land carbon is underestimated by global models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biogeosciences
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7609-2026
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of shrub coverage for arctic ecosystem carbon uptake and storage

Klaus Steenberg Larsen, Fabrice Kenneth Michel Lacroix, Carolina Voigt, Sofie Sjögersten et al.
1 links
Biogeosciences
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Impacts of shrub coverage for arctic ecosystem carbon uptake and storage

Klaus Steenberg Larsen, Fabrice Kenneth Michel Lacroix, Carolina Voigt, Sofie Sjögersten, Sönke Zaehle, Eeva‐Stiina Tuittila, Cheng Gong, Tamara Emmerichs, Victor A. Brovkin, Yu Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Although shrubs employ distinct water- and carbon-use strategies compared to trees and are increasingly expanding across warming tundra and grassland, they remain insufficiently represented in global land surface models. Here, we incorporated two shrub types, deciduous and evergreen, into the nutrient-enabled terrestrial biosphere model QUINCY, which features a state-of-the-art treatment of soil nutrient dynamics and carbon exchange. We investigate the change in carbon fluxes and storage due to shrub cover, it's response to climate and CO2 fertilization effect and the role of nitrogen availability. With this new implementation, shrubs showed reasonable seasonal cycle of gross primary production (GPP) at 50 % of the Arctic study sites. The model achieved mean R2 values of 0.5 and 0.6, when compared with in situ measurements and remote sensing products for modeled shrubs. However, at 50 % of the study sites the model underestimated observed GPP due to too strong simulated nitrogen limitation. Compared to needle leaved evergreen forest the modeled gross primary production of shrubs is similarly distributed with a non-significant difference in the median. Compared to graminoids the carbon fluxes of shrubs are 40 % higher. Shrubs produce a substantial, though lower, above-ground biomass than needle leaved trees and show phenological patterns that are distinct from those of trees. Although CO2 fertilization generally benefits all plant types, shrubs appear to maintain a particularly strong growth response under elevated CO2 concentrations. We also demonstrated that the modeled deciduous shrubs reduce their nitrogen sources substantially more than evergreen shrubs, generally resulting in a 50 % decrease in gross primary production. Providing the plants with unlimited nitrogen and thus doubling gross primary production at most sites improved the model-measurement agreement by 15 %. A similar effect occurred when initializing nitrogen and carbon contents best on permafrost profiles, resulting in partly alleviating nitrogen limitation in the model. These finding underlines the importance of including evergreen and deciduous shrub PFTs in global land surface models to accurately predict ongoing changes in the Arctic carbon cycle. However, the strong nitrogen limitation of Arctic shrub productivity when using the standard model parametrizations suggests that the Arctic contribution to global land carbon is underestimated by global models.

BiogeosciencesVol. 23(20)
University of Bern (CH), University of Copenhagen (DK), Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), University of Nottingham (GB), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (DE)
National Science Foundation, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Climate action, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon