Logical Consequences: Toward an Integrative Theoretical Framework

ABSTRACT We offer an integrative definition of the parental construct of logical consequences (LC), with the aim of stimulating research on their role in child socialization. Based on an exhaustive review of theoretical and empirical literature, we propose that LC are non‐need‐thwarting (i.e., ranging from need‐neutral to need‐supportive) parental constraints that address problems created by children's transgressions. Embedded in problem solving, they are hypothesized to promote child compliance and internalization of rules simultaneously, thereby fostering responsibility and social integration. Empirical evidence regarding LC is still nascent, as past research has often conflated LC with other parental interventions. To increase conceptual clarity, we present historical background on LC followed by an integrative definition. Next, we provide an overview of the emerging empirical evidence supporting the use of LC, emphasizing their role in fostering child socialization. Then, we distinguish LC from other well‐known disciplinary interventions, including mild punishments and reasoning. We conclude with potential avenues for future research.