The effect of disruptive protests on public opinion

Abstract Recently, the world has seen a wave of activism of a particular kind: disruptive, non-violent protests such as strikes, blockades or sit-ins. In this review, I collect the evidence on how such protests affect public opinion— a key way in which activists seek to influence policy. I find that disruptive protests cause opposition to the disruptive group, its tactics, and perhaps its specific policy demand. At the same time, they are better than conventional protests at generating media attention and large corresponding increases in issue salience. With respect to broader attitudes and behaviors, such as concern about the issue itself or voting, null or small positive effects are typical. So while disruptive groups and their tactics are disliked, they do garner attention, and on the whole they do not usually seem to move people away from their cause. Further research should investigate the longevity of these effects and whether they hold for all issues, as much of the current research focuses on environmental movements.

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag082
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of disruptive protests on public opinion

PNAS Nexus
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

The effect of disruptive protests on public opinion

article en

Abstract

Abstract Recently, the world has seen a wave of activism of a particular kind: disruptive, non-violent protests such as strikes, blockades or sit-ins. In this review, I collect the evidence on how such protests affect public opinion— a key way in which activists seek to influence policy. I find that disruptive protests cause opposition to the disruptive group, its tactics, and perhaps its specific policy demand. At the same time, they are better than conventional protests at generating media attention and large corresponding increases in issue salience. With respect to broader attitudes and behaviors, such as concern about the issue itself or voting, null or small positive effects are typical. So while disruptive groups and their tactics are disliked, they do garner attention, and on the whole they do not usually seem to move people away from their cause. Further research should investigate the longevity of these effects and whether they hold for all issues, as much of the current research focuses on environmental movements.

PNAS Nexus
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.