Assessing Financial Stress in China and ASEAN-4 Economies

HRMARS - The significant economic effects of multiple financial crises have necessitated the development of tools for measuring financial stress. This study constructed financial stress indices for four sub-markets — banking, bonds, stocks, and foreign exchange —and for China and the ASEAN-4 economies (Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia) from November 2006 to February 2024. The methodology primarily employed a dynamic CRITIC weighting method to analyze and integrate eight indicators across four sub-markets and compare it with the traditional static methods. This proposed model can consistently capture the correlation among submarkets. This feature is particularly important during a crisis, as banks and foreign-exchange risks often become more closely intertwined, making the index more suitable for emerging markets. In addition, it conducted a comparative analysis of financial stress dynamics between China and the four ASEAN countries over 18 years, revealing distinct risk characteristics: the evolution of stress in China is relatively smooth, whereas that in ASEAN economies is more sensitive to global capital flows and liquidity shocks. The empirical results demonstrate that dynamic weighting is an alternative tool for tracking financial stress during periods of heightened market turbulence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v16-i3/27877
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Financial Stress in China and ASEAN-4 Economies

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Assessing Financial Stress in China and ASEAN-4 Economies

article en

Abstract

HRMARS - The significant economic effects of multiple financial crises have necessitated the development of tools for measuring financial stress. This study constructed financial stress indices for four sub-markets — banking, bonds, stocks, and foreign exchange —and for China and the ASEAN-4 economies (Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia) from November 2006 to February 2024. The methodology primarily employed a dynamic CRITIC weighting method to analyze and integrate eight indicators across four sub-markets and compare it with the traditional static methods. This proposed model can consistently capture the correlation among submarkets. This feature is particularly important during a crisis, as banks and foreign-exchange risks often become more closely intertwined, making the index more suitable for emerging markets. In addition, it conducted a comparative analysis of financial stress dynamics between China and the four ASEAN countries over 18 years, revealing distinct risk characteristics: the evolution of stress in China is relatively smooth, whereas that in ASEAN economies is more sensitive to global capital flows and liquidity shocks. The empirical results demonstrate that dynamic weighting is an alternative tool for tracking financial stress during periods of heightened market turbulence.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 16(3)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Financial Research (Hungary) (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.