Tumor Boundary Delineation in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of 11C-MET PET and FLAIR MRI in Surgical Decision-Making

Abstract Purpose Supramaximal resection (SUPR) in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) aims to improve survival by extending resection beyond contrast-enhancing lesions into non-enhancing FLAIR-hyperintense regions. The role of metabolically guided resection with ^11C-methionine positron emission tomography (^11C-MET PET) as an alternative approach has not been systematically investigated. This study compares volumetric and clinical outcomes of ^11C-MET PET versus MRI guidance in IDH-wildtype GBM. Methods We performed a prospective, single-center study (2020–2024) including patients undergoing PET-guided resection for newly diagnosed, contrast-enhancing GBM. All patients received preoperative MRI and ^11C-MET PET, followed by early postoperative imaging. Survival outcomes were compared with those of a matched SUPR, NTR (Near-total resection), and CR (Complete resection) cohort, according to the updated RANO criteria. Results In all cases, preoperative PET volume exceeded the contrast-enhancing (CE) volume. Spatial overlap between PET-based volume and FLAIR tumor volume (FLAIR-TV) was observed in 91.2% of cases, while in 8.8% the PET volume was larger. Strong correlations were found between FLAIR-TV and PET volumes (r = 0.90) and between CE and PET volumes (r = 0.84). No baseline differences were identified between groups in sex, age, MGMT promoter methylation, tumor location, or preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the SUPR group compared with the PET group (PFS: 20 vs. 14.9 months, P = .0003; OS: 24 vs. 21.9 months, P = .025), with the NTR group (PFS: 20 vs 11 months, P < .001; OS: 24 vs 15 months, P = .001) and CR group (PFS: 20 vs 13 months, P < .001; OS 24 vs 17 months, P = .001). Conclusions ^11C-MET PET effectively delineates infiltrative margins and detects aggressive subclones. However, SUPR provides superior survival compared with PET-guided resections alone, supporting PET as a complementary tool rather than a stand-alone modality in surgical planning for IDH-wildtype GBM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Practice
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npag023
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tumor Boundary Delineation in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of 11C-MET PET and FLAIR MRI in Surgical Decision-Making

Beatrice Bono, Federico Pessina, Andrea Pizzi, Zefferino Rossini et al.
Neuro-Oncology Practice
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Tumor Boundary Delineation in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of 11C-MET PET and FLAIR MRI in Surgical Decision-Making

Beatrice Bono, Federico Pessina, Andrea Pizzi, Zefferino Rossini, Maria Pia Tropeano, Elena Clerici, M. Scorsetti, Ettore Bresciani, Letterio Salvatore Politi, A. Franzini, Matteo Simonelli, Pierina Navarria
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Supramaximal resection (SUPR) in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) aims to improve survival by extending resection beyond contrast-enhancing lesions into non-enhancing FLAIR-hyperintense regions. The role of metabolically guided resection with ^11C-methionine positron emission tomography (^11C-MET PET) as an alternative approach has not been systematically investigated. This study compares volumetric and clinical outcomes of ^11C-MET PET versus MRI guidance in IDH-wildtype GBM. Methods We performed a prospective, single-center study (2020–2024) including patients undergoing PET-guided resection for newly diagnosed, contrast-enhancing GBM. All patients received preoperative MRI and ^11C-MET PET, followed by early postoperative imaging. Survival outcomes were compared with those of a matched SUPR, NTR (Near-total resection), and CR (Complete resection) cohort, according to the updated RANO criteria. Results In all cases, preoperative PET volume exceeded the contrast-enhancing (CE) volume. Spatial overlap between PET-based volume and FLAIR tumor volume (FLAIR-TV) was observed in 91.2% of cases, while in 8.8% the PET volume was larger. Strong correlations were found between FLAIR-TV and PET volumes (r = 0.90) and between CE and PET volumes (r = 0.84). No baseline differences were identified between groups in sex, age, MGMT promoter methylation, tumor location, or preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the SUPR group compared with the PET group (PFS: 20 vs. 14.9 months, P = .0003; OS: 24 vs. 21.9 months, P = .025), with the NTR group (PFS: 20 vs 11 months, P < .001; OS: 24 vs 15 months, P = .001) and CR group (PFS: 20 vs 13 months, P < .001; OS 24 vs 17 months, P = .001). Conclusions ^11C-MET PET effectively delineates infiltrative margins and detects aggressive subclones. However, SUPR provides superior survival compared with PET-guided resections alone, supporting PET as a complementary tool rather than a stand-alone modality in surgical planning for IDH-wildtype GBM.

Neuro-Oncology Practice
Humanitas University (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.