Biotechnological approaches for non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers in aquatic monitoring

Non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers such as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), protein carbonyls (PC), and reduced glutathione (GSH) are among the most widely applied endpoints in aquatic biomonitoring and ecotoxicology, with relevance for assessing pollution across coastal, estuarine, and marine ecosystems. Despite decades of use, however, their translation into robust environmental monitoring tools remains constrained by analytical and interpretative bottlenecks, including poor interlaboratory comparability, lack of harmonized sampling and storage procedures, matrix interferences, inconsistent normalization strategies, and insufficient quality assurance frameworks. This review critically examines the use of non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers in aquatic systems, shifting the focus from biomarker relevance toward methodological and technological barriers that currently limit operational deployment. We synthesize evidence on methodological variability, analytical artefacts, and confounding factors affecting biomarker responses across biological matrices and environmental contexts. Our analysis highlights that TBARS, PC, and GSH are highly sensitive indicators of oxidative damage associated with exposure to diverse contaminant classes, including metals, organic pollutants, and complex contaminant mixtures. However, substantial heterogeneity in analytical approaches and experimental designs across studies continues to hinder interstudy comparability and the establishment of ecologically meaningful baseline values. Finally, we propose a technology-oriented roadmap for improving biomarker standardization and field applicability, including minimum reporting requirements, validation priorities, and scalable analytical strategies such as miniaturized assays, microfluidic platforms, biosensing technologies, and smartphone-based detection systems. Overall, the integration of these approaches may facilitate the transition of non-enzymatic oxidative biomarkers from research endpoints to standardized and operational tools for environmental monitoring and decision-making in aquatic ecosystems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.119626
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biotechnological approaches for non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers in aquatic monitoring

Marine Pollution Bulletin
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Biotechnological approaches for non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers in aquatic monitoring

article en

Abstract

Non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers such as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), protein carbonyls (PC), and reduced glutathione (GSH) are among the most widely applied endpoints in aquatic biomonitoring and ecotoxicology, with relevance for assessing pollution across coastal, estuarine, and marine ecosystems. Despite decades of use, however, their translation into robust environmental monitoring tools remains constrained by analytical and interpretative bottlenecks, including poor interlaboratory comparability, lack of harmonized sampling and storage procedures, matrix interferences, inconsistent normalization strategies, and insufficient quality assurance frameworks. This review critically examines the use of non-enzymatic oxidative stress biomarkers in aquatic systems, shifting the focus from biomarker relevance toward methodological and technological barriers that currently limit operational deployment. We synthesize evidence on methodological variability, analytical artefacts, and confounding factors affecting biomarker responses across biological matrices and environmental contexts. Our analysis highlights that TBARS, PC, and GSH are highly sensitive indicators of oxidative damage associated with exposure to diverse contaminant classes, including metals, organic pollutants, and complex contaminant mixtures. However, substantial heterogeneity in analytical approaches and experimental designs across studies continues to hinder interstudy comparability and the establishment of ecologically meaningful baseline values. Finally, we propose a technology-oriented roadmap for improving biomarker standardization and field applicability, including minimum reporting requirements, validation priorities, and scalable analytical strategies such as miniaturized assays, microfluidic platforms, biosensing technologies, and smartphone-based detection systems. Overall, the integration of these approaches may facilitate the transition of non-enzymatic oxidative biomarkers from research endpoints to standardized and operational tools for environmental monitoring and decision-making in aquatic ecosystems.

Marine Pollution BulletinVol. 228
Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira (BR), University of Aveiro (PT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.