A prospective case-control study of risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with reduced fetal movements

Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is a frequent reason for referral to maternity services and may signal risk of adverse outcomes, particularly stillbirth. To identify contemporary maternal and pregnancy-related risk factors for RFM and to examine associations between RFM and perinatal outcomes. A prospective case-control study in a large urban maternity hospital in Ireland was conducted. Women with singleton pregnancies with RFM at ≥24 weeks’ gestation between 1 January and 30 September 2020 (cases) were compared with randomly selected women without RFM during pregnancy (controls) from the same population and timeframe. Associations were assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A total of 850 women with RFM were compared with 1,743 controls. Women with RFM were younger (mean age [SD] 33.8 [5.04] vs 34.4 [4.93] years; p=0.004), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (mean [SD] 26.6 [5.76] v 25.89 [5.10]; p<0.05) and more likely nulliparous (68% vs 43.8%; p<0.001). Multivariable analyses identified anterior placenta (OR 1.24 95%CI 1.05-1.46; p=0.01), a prior history of neonatal death (OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.43–15.15; p=0.01), and recurrent miscarriage (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.99–2.72; p=0.05) as independent risk factors for RFM. RFM was not associated with stillbirth, preterm birth or neonatal death but was significantly associated with small for gestational age (SGA) infants (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-2.02). Women with RFM were more likely to undergo induction of labour (aOR 1.44 95%CI 1.20-1.74) but not emergency caesarean section (aOR 1.20 95% CI 0.80-1.80), or neonatal intensive care admission. RFM is influenced by maternal and pregnancy characteristics and is associated with SGA but not severe adverse perinatal outcomes. Careful assessment of women presenting with RFM, targeted growth surveillance, antenatal education and standardised care pathways are essential to optimise maternal and fetal well-being, inform clinical practice, and guide policy in contemporary maternity care.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Midwifery
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2026.104786
Primary Topic
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective case-control study of risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with reduced fetal movements

Midwifery
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
article

A prospective case-control study of risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with reduced fetal movements

article en

Abstract

Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is a frequent reason for referral to maternity services and may signal risk of adverse outcomes, particularly stillbirth. To identify contemporary maternal and pregnancy-related risk factors for RFM and to examine associations between RFM and perinatal outcomes. A prospective case-control study in a large urban maternity hospital in Ireland was conducted. Women with singleton pregnancies with RFM at ≥24 weeks’ gestation between 1 January and 30 September 2020 (cases) were compared with randomly selected women without RFM during pregnancy (controls) from the same population and timeframe. Associations were assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. A total of 850 women with RFM were compared with 1,743 controls. Women with RFM were younger (mean age [SD] 33.8 [5.04] vs 34.4 [4.93] years; p=0.004), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (mean [SD] 26.6 [5.76] v 25.89 [5.10]; p<0.05) and more likely nulliparous (68% vs 43.8%; p<0.001). Multivariable analyses identified anterior placenta (OR 1.24 95%CI 1.05-1.46; p=0.01), a prior history of neonatal death (OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.43–15.15; p=0.01), and recurrent miscarriage (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.99–2.72; p=0.05) as independent risk factors for RFM. RFM was not associated with stillbirth, preterm birth or neonatal death but was significantly associated with small for gestational age (SGA) infants (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-2.02). Women with RFM were more likely to undergo induction of labour (aOR 1.44 95%CI 1.20-1.74) but not emergency caesarean section (aOR 1.20 95% CI 0.80-1.80), or neonatal intensive care admission. RFM is influenced by maternal and pregnancy characteristics and is associated with SGA but not severe adverse perinatal outcomes. Careful assessment of women presenting with RFM, targeted growth surveillance, antenatal education and standardised care pathways are essential to optimise maternal and fetal well-being, inform clinical practice, and guide policy in contemporary maternity care.

MidwiferyVol. 157
University College Dublin (IE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), National Maternity Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.