Cost overrun and root causes: a systematic literature review of public investment projects in Norway

Cost overrun has been frequently cited as a threatening factor of economic efficiency in public projects. Although international experiences have facilitated identification of the underlying causes, i.e., underestimation, optimism bias, etc., there is shortage of unified evidence in the context of Norway. Thus, this study puts forward to exploring the main causes of cost overrun in Norway and presenting a more unified manifest to academicians and practitioners. To achieve this goal, we have conducted a scoping review to collect and analyze the studies which investigate the factors resulting in cost overrun in the public projects of Norway. In this regard, the systematic literature review (SLR) technique is employed to minimize biased data synthesis, and ensure rigorous inferences. The derived factors are attributed to four taxonomies: technical, economic, psychological, and political, where the first group bears the highest proportion of causes. The results also indicate that external drivers, e.g., market conditions, have had the highest impact on the cost overrun which does not necessarily comply with the international inferences. Thus, further discussion is presented to highlight these distinctions which is then complemented by shedding light on the factors limiting this research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.150
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost overrun and root causes: a systematic literature review of public investment projects in Norway

Asmamaw Tadege Shiferaw, Hanna Steine, Mathew Azarian
Procedia Computer Science
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Cost overrun and root causes: a systematic literature review of public investment projects in Norway

Asmamaw Tadege Shiferaw, Hanna Steine, Mathew Azarian
article en

Abstract

Cost overrun has been frequently cited as a threatening factor of economic efficiency in public projects. Although international experiences have facilitated identification of the underlying causes, i.e., underestimation, optimism bias, etc., there is shortage of unified evidence in the context of Norway. Thus, this study puts forward to exploring the main causes of cost overrun in Norway and presenting a more unified manifest to academicians and practitioners. To achieve this goal, we have conducted a scoping review to collect and analyze the studies which investigate the factors resulting in cost overrun in the public projects of Norway. In this regard, the systematic literature review (SLR) technique is employed to minimize biased data synthesis, and ensure rigorous inferences. The derived factors are attributed to four taxonomies: technical, economic, psychological, and political, where the first group bears the highest proportion of causes. The results also indicate that external drivers, e.g., market conditions, have had the highest impact on the cost overrun which does not necessarily comply with the international inferences. Thus, further discussion is presented to highlight these distinctions which is then complemented by shedding light on the factors limiting this research.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 278
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.