Emission reduction potential of freeway stop-and-go wave smoothing

The real-world potential of stop-and-go wave smoothing at scale remains largely unquantified. Smoothing freeway waves requires opening a gap large enough for them to dissipate, but that gap is often impractically large. We propose a counterfactual wave-smoothing benchmark that reconstructs a smooth, feasible trajectory from each empirical trajectory by solving a quadratic program with fixed boundary conditions and a maximum-gap constraint, and we use the MOVES model to estimate the resulting emission reduction potential. Applying the framework to nine weeks of weekday peak-period data from the I-24 MOTION testbed, which exhibits rich day-to-day variation in wave dynamics, we find meaningful potential for passenger cars under a 0.1-mile maximum-gap constraint: average CO 2 reductions of 9.80% to 14.08% across lanes, with 12.94% to 25.70% in CO, 24.29% to 29.76% in HC, and 29.40% to 36.03% in NOx. Trucks emerge as particularly attractive targets, showing roughly twice the reduction potential of passenger cars.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105605
Primary Topic
Traffic control and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emission reduction potential of freeway stop-and-go wave smoothing

William Barbour, Jonathan Sprinkle, Derek Gloudemans, Junyi Ji et al.
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Traffic control and management
article

Emission reduction potential of freeway stop-and-go wave smoothing

William Barbour, Jonathan Sprinkle, Derek Gloudemans, Junyi Ji, Benedetto Piccoli, Daniel B. Work, Gergely Zachár
article en

Abstract

The real-world potential of stop-and-go wave smoothing at scale remains largely unquantified. Smoothing freeway waves requires opening a gap large enough for them to dissipate, but that gap is often impractically large. We propose a counterfactual wave-smoothing benchmark that reconstructs a smooth, feasible trajectory from each empirical trajectory by solving a quadratic program with fixed boundary conditions and a maximum-gap constraint, and we use the MOVES model to estimate the resulting emission reduction potential. Applying the framework to nine weeks of weekday peak-period data from the I-24 MOTION testbed, which exhibits rich day-to-day variation in wave dynamics, we find meaningful potential for passenger cars under a 0.1-mile maximum-gap constraint: average CO 2 reductions of 9.80% to 14.08% across lanes, with 12.94% to 25.70% in CO, 24.29% to 29.76% in HC, and 29.40% to 36.03% in NOx. Trucks emerge as particularly attractive targets, showing roughly twice the reduction potential of passenger cars.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 161
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), Department of Mathematical Sciences (RU), Integrated Software (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Traffic control and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.