Reframing human–elephant conflict in India through context-dependent coexistence strategies

Human–Elephant Conflict (HEC) has escalated into one of India's most serious conservation and socio-economic challenges, with high costs for both people and elephants. We examined national-level trends in HEC from 2009 to 2024 and evaluated the effectiveness of current policies in mitigating it. Over the past 16 years, a total of 7,868 human fatalities were recorded from elephant encounters, averaging nearly 500 deaths annually. Notably, four states, Odisha, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Assam, accounted for almost 70% of these incidents, underscoring their status as critical conflict hotspots. During the same period, 1,653 elephants died from anthropogenic causes, with electrocution, train collisions, poaching, and poisoning emerging as the most persistent threats. Together, these figures highlight the scale and urgency of addressing HEC in India, which supports over 60% of the global wild Asian elephant population. Our study also evaluated the effectiveness of India’s current mitigation measures by combining mortality data analysis with perception surveys of 428 stakeholders, including Forest Department managers, researchers, and NGOs across 33 Elephant Reserves and elephant range states. Findings revealed that solar-powered fences and mobile-based early warning systems were widely regarded as effective, particularly in fragmented landscapes. In contrast, structural barriers such as trenches and concrete walls were perceived as costly, difficult to maintain, and less effective in the long term. Compensation schemes, although critical, were undermined by delays, inadequate rates, and procedural hurdles that erode community trust. Rapid Response Teams were valued for their role in conflict management but remain constrained by insufficient training, workforce, and resources. Overall, India's HEC policy framework remains fragmented, with generalized strategies unable to capture the ecological heterogeneity and socio-political diversity of elephant landscapes. Addressing these challenges requires decentralization, regionally tailored interventions, streamlined compensation systems, and stronger community participation. Embedding mitigation into broader land-use planning, ecological restoration, and corridor connectivity is equally critical. Implementing adaptive, participatory, and technology-driven strategies can help India minimize human and elephant mortality while enabling long-term coexistence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2026.1762380
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing human–elephant conflict in India through context-dependent coexistence strategies

Frontiers in Conservation Science
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Reframing human–elephant conflict in India through context-dependent coexistence strategies

article en

Abstract

Human–Elephant Conflict (HEC) has escalated into one of India's most serious conservation and socio-economic challenges, with high costs for both people and elephants. We examined national-level trends in HEC from 2009 to 2024 and evaluated the effectiveness of current policies in mitigating it. Over the past 16 years, a total of 7,868 human fatalities were recorded from elephant encounters, averaging nearly 500 deaths annually. Notably, four states, Odisha, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Assam, accounted for almost 70% of these incidents, underscoring their status as critical conflict hotspots. During the same period, 1,653 elephants died from anthropogenic causes, with electrocution, train collisions, poaching, and poisoning emerging as the most persistent threats. Together, these figures highlight the scale and urgency of addressing HEC in India, which supports over 60% of the global wild Asian elephant population. Our study also evaluated the effectiveness of India’s current mitigation measures by combining mortality data analysis with perception surveys of 428 stakeholders, including Forest Department managers, researchers, and NGOs across 33 Elephant Reserves and elephant range states. Findings revealed that solar-powered fences and mobile-based early warning systems were widely regarded as effective, particularly in fragmented landscapes. In contrast, structural barriers such as trenches and concrete walls were perceived as costly, difficult to maintain, and less effective in the long term. Compensation schemes, although critical, were undermined by delays, inadequate rates, and procedural hurdles that erode community trust. Rapid Response Teams were valued for their role in conflict management but remain constrained by insufficient training, workforce, and resources. Overall, India's HEC policy framework remains fragmented, with generalized strategies unable to capture the ecological heterogeneity and socio-political diversity of elephant landscapes. Addressing these challenges requires decentralization, regionally tailored interventions, streamlined compensation systems, and stronger community participation. Embedding mitigation into broader land-use planning, ecological restoration, and corridor connectivity is equally critical. Implementing adaptive, participatory, and technology-driven strategies can help India minimize human and elephant mortality while enabling long-term coexistence.

Frontiers in Conservation ScienceVol. 7
Wildlife Institute of India (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.