Comparative evaluation of charge transport in polyaniline tungsten trioxide graphene nanocomposites deposited on taconic FR4 and silicon substrates

The performance of polymer-based sensors is highly dependent on the selected substrate material, as it plays a crucial role in determining sensor stability, polymer adhesion, and overall signal quality. This work presents a systematic comparative investigation of how substrate selection critically influences the electrical behavior of conducting polymer nanocomposites. Compared to prior studies that investigated Taconic, FR4 (flame retardant-4), or silicon substrates individually, this work presents a direct and systematic comparative analysis of all three substrates for hydrochloric acid (HCl)-doped polyaniline (PANI) nanocomposites reinforced with tungsten trioxide (WO3) and graphene, fabricated using the spin-coating technique. This work demonstrates how substrate-dependent coating thickness and surface morphology control the charge transport, which presents an alternative approach to device optimization. The polyaniline nanocomposites were synthesized via in-situ chemical polymerization with varying filler concentrations and characterized using SEM, TEM, XRD, FTIR, and impedance analysis. The nanocomposites were deposited onto the substrates using spin coating, and the charge transport mechanism was assessed through current–voltage (I–V) measurements. The study shows that both the substrate type and the coating thickness have a substantial impact on electrical conductivity. Among the substrates, FR4 exhibited a minimum conductivity of 2⋅10− 4 S/cm, Taconic showed 9⋅10− 7 S/cm, while the silicon wafer demonstrated the highest conductivity of 1.9⋅10− 3 S/cm at 10 wt% filler concentration, confirming its superior charge transport properties. Although Taconic offers superior microwave properties, its chemically inert surface and weaker adhesion lead to non-uniform coatings, which reduce interfacial charge transport and electrical performance. These results indicate that thinner and smoother coating promotes better electrical conduction. The study affirms that careful choice of substrate and filler optimization are key to achieving superior performance in polymer-based electronic and sensor technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Materials
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-026-00607-5
Primary Topic
Conducting polymers and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of charge transport in polyaniline tungsten trioxide graphene nanocomposites deposited on taconic FR4 and silicon substrates

Saisha Vinjamuri, M. Keerthana, P. Jisha, M. S. Suma
Discover Materials
Conducting polymers and applications
article

Comparative evaluation of charge transport in polyaniline tungsten trioxide graphene nanocomposites deposited on taconic FR4 and silicon substrates

Saisha Vinjamuri, M. Keerthana, P. Jisha, M. S. Suma
article en

Abstract

The performance of polymer-based sensors is highly dependent on the selected substrate material, as it plays a crucial role in determining sensor stability, polymer adhesion, and overall signal quality. This work presents a systematic comparative investigation of how substrate selection critically influences the electrical behavior of conducting polymer nanocomposites. Compared to prior studies that investigated Taconic, FR4 (flame retardant-4), or silicon substrates individually, this work presents a direct and systematic comparative analysis of all three substrates for hydrochloric acid (HCl)-doped polyaniline (PANI) nanocomposites reinforced with tungsten trioxide (WO3) and graphene, fabricated using the spin-coating technique. This work demonstrates how substrate-dependent coating thickness and surface morphology control the charge transport, which presents an alternative approach to device optimization. The polyaniline nanocomposites were synthesized via in-situ chemical polymerization with varying filler concentrations and characterized using SEM, TEM, XRD, FTIR, and impedance analysis. The nanocomposites were deposited onto the substrates using spin coating, and the charge transport mechanism was assessed through current–voltage (I–V) measurements. The study shows that both the substrate type and the coating thickness have a substantial impact on electrical conductivity. Among the substrates, FR4 exhibited a minimum conductivity of 2⋅10− 4 S/cm, Taconic showed 9⋅10− 7 S/cm, while the silicon wafer demonstrated the highest conductivity of 1.9⋅10− 3 S/cm at 10 wt% filler concentration, confirming its superior charge transport properties. Although Taconic offers superior microwave properties, its chemically inert surface and weaker adhesion lead to non-uniform coatings, which reduce interfacial charge transport and electrical performance. These results indicate that thinner and smoother coating promotes better electrical conduction. The study affirms that careful choice of substrate and filler optimization are key to achieving superior performance in polymer-based electronic and sensor technologies.

Discover Materials
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Conducting polymers and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.