Consensus report from the Havemeyer Working Group Meetings on Equine Pain Assessment

Summary Recognition and assessment of pain in horses remain fundamental yet challenging aspects of equine clinical practice and welfare. Unlike human patients, horses cannot self‐report pain, requiring clinicians to rely on behavioural observation, physiological indicators and structured assessment tools. Over the past two decades, numerous pain scales and methodologies have been developed; however, inconsistent adoption in everyday practice persists due to complexity, training requirements and limited applicability across clinical contexts. The Havemeyer Working Group on Equine Pain Assessment convened international experts in equine medicine, anaesthesia, surgery, behaviour and welfare to evaluate current methodologies and establish a pathway toward standardisation. Two consensus meetings were held in Reykjavík (2022) and West Chester (2024). The first meeting reviewed existing approaches, including behavioural observation, facial expression analysis, ethogram‐based systems, composite pain scales, gait analysis, quantitative sensory testing and condition‐specific tools for foals, donkeys and postoperative or chronic pain. Participants concluded that no single method adequately captures the multidimensional nature of equine pain. The second meeting focused on practical implementation. Among available instruments, the Equine Pain Scale (EPS) was identified as the most feasible candidate for routine clinical use due to its brevity, multidimensional structure and demonstrated reliability across observers. The Working Group emphasised that successful implementation requires education, integration into electronic medical records and multicentre data collection rather than further proliferation of new scales. Overall, the consensus report highlights the need to treat pain assessment as a core clinical vital sign. Immediate adoption of standardised, practical scoring – particularly the EPS – combined with ongoing validation studies and emerging technologies such as automated video analysis represents the most effective strategy to improve equine welfare and clinical decision‐making.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equine Veterinary Education
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.70099
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus report from the Havemeyer Working Group Meetings on Equine Pain Assessment

Equine Veterinary Education
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
article

Consensus report from the Havemeyer Working Group Meetings on Equine Pain Assessment

article en

Abstract

Summary Recognition and assessment of pain in horses remain fundamental yet challenging aspects of equine clinical practice and welfare. Unlike human patients, horses cannot self‐report pain, requiring clinicians to rely on behavioural observation, physiological indicators and structured assessment tools. Over the past two decades, numerous pain scales and methodologies have been developed; however, inconsistent adoption in everyday practice persists due to complexity, training requirements and limited applicability across clinical contexts. The Havemeyer Working Group on Equine Pain Assessment convened international experts in equine medicine, anaesthesia, surgery, behaviour and welfare to evaluate current methodologies and establish a pathway toward standardisation. Two consensus meetings were held in Reykjavík (2022) and West Chester (2024). The first meeting reviewed existing approaches, including behavioural observation, facial expression analysis, ethogram‐based systems, composite pain scales, gait analysis, quantitative sensory testing and condition‐specific tools for foals, donkeys and postoperative or chronic pain. Participants concluded that no single method adequately captures the multidimensional nature of equine pain. The second meeting focused on practical implementation. Among available instruments, the Equine Pain Scale (EPS) was identified as the most feasible candidate for routine clinical use due to its brevity, multidimensional structure and demonstrated reliability across observers. The Working Group emphasised that successful implementation requires education, integration into electronic medical records and multicentre data collection rather than further proliferation of new scales. Overall, the consensus report highlights the need to treat pain assessment as a core clinical vital sign. Immediate adoption of standardised, practical scoring – particularly the EPS – combined with ongoing validation studies and emerging technologies such as automated video analysis represents the most effective strategy to improve equine welfare and clinical decision‐making.

Equine Veterinary Education
University of Bern (CH), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Antwerp (BE), University of Milan (IT), Utrecht University (NL), American Public Gardens Association (US), Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences (NL), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Province of Antwerp (BE), Internationale Vereniging voor Neerlandistiek (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.