Implementing Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Using Artificial Intelligence for Colonic Segmentation and Preparation Scoring

Background & Purpose: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) relies on subjective assessment with inter-observer variability. This study aimed to develop an AI-based system for real-time automated evaluation of bowel preparation quality to improve accuracy and consistency. Methods: A three-module AI system was developed: 1) EfficientNet-B0 for ileocecal valve detection (trained on 10,000 images); 2) ResNet-50 for colon segmentation (right/left colonic flexures, 12,350 images); 3) ResNet-50 for BBPS scoring (50,000 images). Models were trained on 1,015 annotated colonoscopy videos and validated via independent test datasets and a prospective real-time study. Results: The ileocecal valve detection achieved 99.5% accuracy (AUC 0.996). Colon segmentation showed 89.0% overall accuracy (AUC 0.908–0.913 across regions). The BBPS scoring model achieved 88.3% accuracy, with strong agreement with experts (p<0.001). Prospective real-time evaluation reached 91.5% accuracy, endorsed by endoscopists for clinical utility. Strengths & Limitations: The system integrates anatomical localization and scoring with real-time efficiency, reducing subjectivity. However, multicenter validation is needed for generalizability. Future work should optimize architectures (e.g., Transformers) and assess long-term clinical impacts. Conclusion: This AI system serves as an auxiliary tool for real-time BBPS scoring, aiding standardized assessment. Future multicenter studies and technical integration are needed to validate its clinical utility.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2840-7023
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Using Artificial Intelligence for Colonic Segmentation and Preparation Scoring

Endoscopy International Open
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Implementing Boston Bowel Preparation Scale Using Artificial Intelligence for Colonic Segmentation and Preparation Scoring

article en

Abstract

Background & Purpose: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) relies on subjective assessment with inter-observer variability. This study aimed to develop an AI-based system for real-time automated evaluation of bowel preparation quality to improve accuracy and consistency. Methods: A three-module AI system was developed: 1) EfficientNet-B0 for ileocecal valve detection (trained on 10,000 images); 2) ResNet-50 for colon segmentation (right/left colonic flexures, 12,350 images); 3) ResNet-50 for BBPS scoring (50,000 images). Models were trained on 1,015 annotated colonoscopy videos and validated via independent test datasets and a prospective real-time study. Results: The ileocecal valve detection achieved 99.5% accuracy (AUC 0.996). Colon segmentation showed 89.0% overall accuracy (AUC 0.908–0.913 across regions). The BBPS scoring model achieved 88.3% accuracy, with strong agreement with experts (p<0.001). Prospective real-time evaluation reached 91.5% accuracy, endorsed by endoscopists for clinical utility. Strengths & Limitations: The system integrates anatomical localization and scoring with real-time efficiency, reducing subjectivity. However, multicenter validation is needed for generalizability. Future work should optimize architectures (e.g., Transformers) and assess long-term clinical impacts. Conclusion: This AI system serves as an auxiliary tool for real-time BBPS scoring, aiding standardized assessment. Future multicenter studies and technical integration are needed to validate its clinical utility.

Endoscopy International Open
Shaoxing University (CN), Shaoxing People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.