On the Optimal Selection of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Voice Deepfake Detection

ABSTRACT The continuous evolution of techniques for generating manipulated audio, known as voice deepfakes, and the widespread availability of tools that produce convincing forgeries have created an urgent need for reliable detection methods. This work considers the dimensionality of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) as a core design variable for practical, deployable systems. The aim is to identify the smallest number of coefficients that preserve detection performance across heterogeneous models while reducing computational cost, a critical factor for mobile and edge deployment. This study evaluates a hybrid setting on the ASVspoof 2019 Logical Access dataset, in which the same feature family serves as input to five traditional machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, k‐Nearest Neighbours, Linear Support Vector Classification, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Support Vector Machine with radial basis function kernel) and five deep learning models (Convolutional Neural Network, Recurrent Neural Network, Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network, Xception and ResNet). Results indicate that deep models reach near‐peak performance with a small number of coefficients, whereas classical methods require a larger number to achieve stable performance (except Linear Support Vector Classification, which consistently underperforms). Accordingly, 32 coefficients are considered an effective operating point for hybrid deployments. Overall, the results provide evidence to guide the selection of the number of MFCC coefficients in voice deepfake detection, aiming for efficient, reproducible and explainable systems.

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70245
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Optimal Selection of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Voice Deepfake Detection

Expert Systems
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
article

On the Optimal Selection of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Voice Deepfake Detection

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The continuous evolution of techniques for generating manipulated audio, known as voice deepfakes, and the widespread availability of tools that produce convincing forgeries have created an urgent need for reliable detection methods. This work considers the dimensionality of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) as a core design variable for practical, deployable systems. The aim is to identify the smallest number of coefficients that preserve detection performance across heterogeneous models while reducing computational cost, a critical factor for mobile and edge deployment. This study evaluates a hybrid setting on the ASVspoof 2019 Logical Access dataset, in which the same feature family serves as input to five traditional machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, k‐Nearest Neighbours, Linear Support Vector Classification, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Support Vector Machine with radial basis function kernel) and five deep learning models (Convolutional Neural Network, Recurrent Neural Network, Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network, Xception and ResNet). Results indicate that deep models reach near‐peak performance with a small number of coefficients, whereas classical methods require a larger number to achieve stable performance (except Linear Support Vector Classification, which consistently underperforms). Accordingly, 32 coefficients are considered an effective operating point for hybrid deployments. Overall, the results provide evidence to guide the selection of the number of MFCC coefficients in voice deepfake detection, aiming for efficient, reproducible and explainable systems.

Expert SystemsVol. 43(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.