Cost Analysis Insights for Offshore CCS Hubs: A Case Study of the Santos Basin, Brazil

ABSTRACT The reuse of decommissioned offshore platforms for geological carbon storage offers a cost‐effective and technically feasible strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in emerging economies. This study presents a comprehensive techno‐economic assessment of offshore carbon capture and storage (CCS) hubs in Brazil, with a focus on the Merluza Field in the Santos Basin. A detailed cost model was developed to quantify capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), and the levelized cost of storage (LCOS) for scenarios involving infrastructure reutilization. Results indicate that site characterization dominates the cost structure, accounting for up to 76% of CAPEX in reuse scenarios, despite an overall 6% reduction in total capital investment when compared with new offshore construction. Annual OPEX is estimated at $7.79 million, and over a 40‐year project lifespan, the net present value of operational costs reaches $104.68 million. The LCOS ranges from $12.72 to $35.54 per ton of CO 2 for a 1.39 Mtpa case, making the Brazilian scenario economically competitive when compared to international benchmarks such as Sleipner and Quest. Moreover, potential revenues from carbon credits and avoided emission penalties could substantially offset total project costs. These findings highlight the financial viability of offshore CCS in Brazil and reinforce its potential integration into national decarbonization strategies under the Paris Agreement. 2026 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Publication Details

Journal
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Published
2026-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.70022
Primary Topic
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost Analysis Insights for Offshore CCS Hubs: A Case Study of the Santos Basin, Brazil

Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
article

Cost Analysis Insights for Offshore CCS Hubs: A Case Study of the Santos Basin, Brazil

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The reuse of decommissioned offshore platforms for geological carbon storage offers a cost‐effective and technically feasible strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in emerging economies. This study presents a comprehensive techno‐economic assessment of offshore carbon capture and storage (CCS) hubs in Brazil, with a focus on the Merluza Field in the Santos Basin. A detailed cost model was developed to quantify capital expenditure (CAPEX), operational expenditure (OPEX), and the levelized cost of storage (LCOS) for scenarios involving infrastructure reutilization. Results indicate that site characterization dominates the cost structure, accounting for up to 76% of CAPEX in reuse scenarios, despite an overall 6% reduction in total capital investment when compared with new offshore construction. Annual OPEX is estimated at $7.79 million, and over a 40‐year project lifespan, the net present value of operational costs reaches $104.68 million. The LCOS ranges from $12.72 to $35.54 per ton of CO 2 for a 1.39 Mtpa case, making the Brazilian scenario economically competitive when compared to international benchmarks such as Sleipner and Quest. Moreover, potential revenues from carbon credits and avoided emission penalties could substantially offset total project costs. These findings highlight the financial viability of offshore CCS in Brazil and reinforce its potential integration into national decarbonization strategies under the Paris Agreement. 2026 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.